search for: 100xx

...r rights. On my DC's. id username uid=10002(ADDOM\usernam) gid=10000(ADDOM\domain users) groups=10000(ADDOM\domain users),3000275(ADDOM\internet-proxy-manual).. And more. Where my Administratos reflex to: id administrator uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) Note the 10000 and 3000275 100xx are assigned GID's with RSAT while 3000275 (RID) does not have any GID assigned. On my domain members the RID number 3000275 is not shown or not used or im using pure windows ACL's These 3000xxx numbers are not used on linux filesystems, only in authentication/security against windows and...

...cated using idmap.ldb, which in the case of user 'mark' returned UID:GID 200026:100. User 'shay' was not in idmap.ldb and with no cache I have to assume winbindd got her information from sam.ldb, which was correct. Back when I changed all domain users from the 3000xx range to the 100xx range in sam.ldb, I probably should have also changed their corresponding settings in idmap.ldb based on objectSid, including changing the 'domain users' GID from 100 to 10000 -- do you agree? Some unanswered questions, perhaps you know the answer to ... How did my domain users get in idm...

On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:54:49 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:26:02 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:36:33 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > Have you tried checking in AD with ldbsearch or ldbedit for the > > > > > actual

...> not enough, you must give their primarygroup (Domain Users) a > 'gidNumber' attribute. all of the AD users are members of the Domain Users group now. Now on DC getent passwd gives just list of local users; getent passwd INTERNAL\\username gives domain user info with uid/gid 100xx:10000 still no changes on fileserver, getent passwd INTERNAL\\username finishes without any msg; in log.winbindd there is notion: 2015/04/06 21:42:37.714639, 3] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_getpwnam.c:56(winbindd_getpwnam_send) getpwnam INTERNAL\username joining to the AD DC ends with jo...

...case > of user 'mark' returned UID:GID 200026:100. > > User 'shay' was not in idmap.ldb and with no cache I have to assume > winbindd got her information from sam.ldb, which was correct. > > Back when I changed all domain users from the 3000xx range to the > 100xx range in sam.ldb, I probably should have also changed their > corresponding settings in idmap.ldb based on objectSid, including > changing the 'domain users' GID from 100 to 10000 -- do you agree? > > Some unanswered questions, perhaps you know the answer to ... > > How...

...ame > uid=10002(ADDOM\usernam) gid=10000(ADDOM\domain users) groups=10000(ADDOM\domain users),3000275(ADDOM\internet-proxy-manual).. And more. > > Where my Administratos reflex to: > id administrator > uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) > > Note the 10000 and 3000275 > 100xx are assigned GID's with RSAT while 3000275 (RID) does not have any GID assigned. > > On my domain members the RID number 3000275 is not shown or not used or im using pure windows ACL's > These 3000xxx numbers are not used on linux filesystems, only in authentication/security again...

Hi, On 18-6-2019 12:57, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I have just tried this as root and it worked for me: > > samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc4 --targetdir=/backup > -Urowland at samdom.example.com > > When I tried to run it as normal user, it threw an error because the > user wasn't allowed access to the backup dir, allowing the user access > cured

.../bash This user was added within the past year with ADUC. This user exists in sam.ldb, but not in idmap.ldb. why? Is idmap.ldb not really necessary? Why are the other users in ldmap.ldb? I added them with ADUC as well. So, back in October 2015 when you advised me to renumber users from 30000xx to 100xx in sam.ldb, should I have also changed the xidNumber's in idmap.ldb? Too many questions for on email? --Mark -----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:54:26 -0500 To: samba at lists.samba.org From: Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Subject: Re: [Samba] getent p...

...e their primarygroup (Domain Users) a >> 'gidNumber' attribute. > > all of the AD users are members of the Domain Users group now. > > Now on DC getent passwd gives just list of local users; > getent passwd INTERNAL\\username gives domain user info with uid/gid > 100xx:10000 > > still no changes on fileserver, getent passwd INTERNAL\\username > finishes without any msg; > in log.winbindd there is notion: > 2015/04/06 21:42:37.714639, 3] > ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_getpwnam.c:56(winbindd_getpwnam_send) > getpwnam INTERNAL\username &g...

...are created with the correct GID and UID. I suppose that means wbinfo will have to return, e.g.: $ wbinfo -i mark HPRS\mark:*:10026:10000:Mark Foley:/home/HPRS/mark:/bin/false instead of 3000026:100. Furthermore, new users created with RSAT ADUAC will have to be created with group 10000 and UIDs 100xx. How do I do that? --Mark -----Original Message----- > Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:18:14 +0100 > From: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba AD PDC , LDAP and Single-Sign-On > > On 10/10/15 08:26, Mark Fo...

...u mean 'all of the AD users are members of the Domain Users group now.' ?? I hope you haven't changed the users primaryGroupID attribute. > > Now on DC getent passwd gives just list of local users; > getent passwd INTERNAL\\username gives domain user info with uid/gid > 100xx:10000 This is what I get when I run getent on one of my DCs: root at dc01:~# getent passwd rowland EXAMPLE\rowland:*:10000:10000:Rowland Penny:/home/EXAMPLE/rowland:/bin/bash NOTE: I also have this line in smb.conf: template shell = /bin/bash > still no changes on fileserver, getent passwd...

Cit?ju Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >> getent passwd shows list of local users, freezes for a while and exits; > > This is possibly because you may have (somehow) the same username in > AD and /etc/passwd even with the "problematic" user removed behaviour is the same (with net ads leave, remove krb5 keytab and join +restart) > >> id

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:07 Andrew Bartlett wrote > For the pain that you are about to endure, I can only offer my apologies. Apologies accepted! :) Seriously though, the Samba team has done a great job with the AD stuff. I was pretty much able to drop Samba4 in as a replacement for our SBS 2008 with virtually no issues. What issues I had were mostly Microsoft idiosyncracies (refer to my GPO

...01 A M I OEMRSDT 0x03000616 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x1dfb0000 ACPI: FADT (v002 A M I OEMFACP 0x03000616 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x1dfb0200 ACPI: MADT (v001 A M I OEMAPIC 0x03000616 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x1dfb0390 ACPI: OEMB (v001 A M I AMI_OEM 0x03000616 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x1dfc0040 ACPI: DSDT (v001 100XX 100XX001 0x00000001 INTL 0x02002026) @ 0x00000000 ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 15:4 APIC version 20 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x81] disabled) Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 0 I/O APICs...

...01 A M I OEMRSDT 0x01000625 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x0dfb0000 ACPI: FADT (v002 A M I OEMFACP 0x01000625 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x0dfb0200 ACPI: MADT (v001 A M I OEMAPIC 0x01000625 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x0dfb0390 ACPI: OEMB (v001 A M I AMI_OEM 0x01000625 MSFT 0x00000097) @ 0x0dfc0040 ACPI: DSDT (v001 100XX 100XX001 0x00000001 INTL 0x02002026) @ 0x00000000 ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 15:4 APIC version 20 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x81] disabled) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec00000] gsi...