search for: 100mbytes

...ch as a central point of network. Internally we use IPv6 protocol. The problem is the following: THE READ PERFORMANCE OF BACKUP SERVER IS DRAMATICALLy LOW: TYPICAL SEQUENTIAL READ FROM NETAPP SHARE FALLS DOWN TO 5-10MBytes/s !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! On the other hand WRITE PERFORMANCE IS OK i.e 80-100MBytes/s During test on our testbed system we could read about 250-280 MBytes/s from our netapp storage (using 10GBit network). The backup server is connected using 1GBit/s network so we expected some 100MBytes/s performance. We tried to find a reason of such slow performance and it looks like it is som...

...'t. Apparently because the ISDN CAPI doesn't use 0 for callers who don't send their number. Is there a way to make * identify ISDN callers who use CLIR? -Walter -- Walter Doerr =*= wd@infodn.rmi.de =*= FAX: +49 2421 962001 "The poor folks who only have 100MBytes of RAM five years from now may not be able to buffer a 16MB packet, but that's their tough luck." (John Gilmore on Mon, 10 Oct 88 18:10:21 PDT)

...too 2006.1, tested with both Samba 3.0.24 and 3.0.25a. Gigabit network is handled by the onboard nForce controller, and it's got a software RAID 5 setup that has been running fine for months. The client is a dual core Windows box with a PCI-Express gigabit card. Netperf pegs the network at 100Mbytes/sec, so there's no problems there. Transfers via FTP on both Windows XP and Vista work out around about 55Mbytes/sec consistently, and SMB transfers under Windows XP also top out around 50-55Mbytes/sec, which seems to be the limit of the I/O on the client. Vista however, no matter what I d...

Hi all, I have been using Xen for a couple of weeks now. So far, I could run domU with direct access to the NIC using late binding method. This way NIC is giving a throughput close to that of native linux system. Now I would like to know whether Xen supports the direct assignment of PCIe virtual function to domU. If yes, how could I do this? Thanks and Regards, Masroor

...have tried something like msn=1234 incomingmsn=1234 context=msn1 msn=4567 incomingmsn=4567 context=msn2 in capi.conf but with no results. Thanks for any hints. -Walter -- Walter Doerr =*= wd@infodn.rmi.de =*= FAX: +49 2421 962001 "The poor folks who only have 100MBytes of RAM five years from now may not be able to buffer a 16MB packet, but that's their tough luck." (John Gilmore on Mon, 10 Oct 88 18:10:21 PDT)

On Wed, 31 May 2017, Barry Flanagan wrote: > sngrep? Isn't sngrep a great tool? Since discovering it my use of tcpdump/wireshark has cratered. Being able to compare an INVITE that worked with one that didn't (with color highlighting) rocks. -- Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Edwards sedwards at sedwards.com

I appear to be seeing the performance of a local ZFS file system degrading over a short period of time. My system configuration: 32 bit Athlon 1800+ CPU 1 Gbyte of RAM Solaris 10 U6 SunOS filer 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc 2x250 GByte Western Digital WD2500JB IDE hard drives 1 zfs pool (striped with the two drives, 449 GBytes total) 1 hard drive has

...connection.) >> >> Try to rsync a file directly to one of the bricks, then to the other brick (don't forget to remove the files after that, as gluster will not know about them). > > If I rsync manually, or scp a file directly to the zpool bricks (outside of gluster) I get 30-100MBytes/s (depending on what I'm copying.) > If I rsync THROUGH gluster (via the glusterfs mounts) I get 1 - 5MB/s >> >> What are your mounting options ? Usually 'noatime,nodiratime' are a good start. > > I'll try these. Currently using ... > (mounting TO serverA) se...

Dtrace and Performance Teams, I have the following IO Performance Specific Questions (and I''m already savy with the lockstat and pre-dtrace utilities for performance analysis.. but in need of details regarding specifying IO bottlenecks @ the controller or IO bus..) : **Q.A*> Determining IO Saturation bottlenecks ( */.. beyond service times and kernel contention.. )/ I''m

...how the mixed results as follows: * The read performance sharply degrades (almost down to 1/20, i.e from 2,000,000 down to 100,000) when the file sizes are larger than 256KBytes. * The write performance remains good (roughly 1,000,000) even with the file sizes larger than 100MBytes. The NFS/ZFS server configuraion and the test environment is briefed as * The ZFS pool for NFS is composed of the 6 disks in stripping with one on each SATA controller. * Solaris 10 Update 5 (Solaris Factory Installation) * The on-board GigE ports are trunked for better I/O and...

Assuming in a secure and trusted env, we want to get the maximum transfer speed without the overhead from ssh. Thanks. Fred -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20121213/654f543f/attachment-0001.html>

Hi all, I discovered lately that two of my XEN servers suffer from a really bad disk throughput - in domU as well as in dom0. All of them run Debian/Etch, Kernel 2.6.18-6-xen (orig. Debian) with XEN 3.2 (backported). The software versions seem to be ok for most machines: Lenovo A57 with S-ATA and (E8200, VT enabled): up to 90MB/s Shuttle, FB61 based, ATA-Disk (Celeron, no VT): up to