search for: 100fd

To whom it may concern, I'm having some issues writing large files to my samba share. After about 11Gb it fails ( for the past three transfer attempts). The Files are sized between 2Gb and 65gb respectively I was getting Oplock errors so i disabled oplock but still have an issue. Below is the output hopefully someone knows what i am doing wrong. TIA Ed [2004/08/04 11:35:47, 1]

We are seeing the following in our logs: Nov 25 16:21:41 fw kernel: martian source 139.142.66.253 from 10.0.0.199, on dev eth0 Nov 25 16:21:41 fw kernel: ll header: 00:a0:c9:60:0e:b2:00:02:7e:21:0e:dc:08:00 00:a0:c9:60:0e:b2 is the mac of our firewall interface on IP 139.142.66.253. 00:02:7e:21:0e:dc is the mac of our Cisco router on IP 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.199 is a Cisco switch - we have about

Hello Everyone, I have been working with two samba servers and i am having problems with the copy speed that i am getting out of the boxes. This is my setup. Dell 450MHZ 128 Mem 2 qlogic fiber cards 1.6T software raid 5/LVM Netgear 10/100 @ 100FD RedHat 7.3 samba 3.0.2a another box is a Compaq 2500 200MHZ 32 Mem 12G software RAID 0 3 drives Intel Pro 100 @ 100FD Debian 3.0 Samba 2.2.8a-0.1 for Debian I can copy a 626.9 MB file from Dell box to the Compaq via ftp and get 3-4 MB/s NFS i get 4-5 MB/s Samba i am getting 1.8-2.0 MB/s. I have...

Win2K box and the file server are on the same switch. They are both configured as 100FD, AutoNeg=Off. I have not met anyone so far with that much performance difference, though some reported 1:2 speed ratio. Attached is our config file for your information. I've searched through this mail lists' archives. I couldn't find a solution, though I've seen people reporting...

I have a problem. I've purchased 2 different brand NAS devices that both use Samba in some form as their "sharing" mechanism. When I attach them to the LAN I get dreadful speed. To the tune of under 3.5GB per hour transfers. I've even done tests on the same subnet. Two Windows servers on that vlan can move files at great speeds. Map one of them to the NAS and it crawls. I recall

...EV_UP): eth0: link is not ready I can't use ethtool to disable autoneg because the nic driver is built into a bzImage. The root fs is currently being mounted via nfs during pxeboot at speed 10, half-duplex. In the past for sk98lin driver I could pass a kernel module parameter sk98lin.ConType=100FD on the kernel boot line. I looked at the r8169.c and tried to hard code the default to autoneg off but that didn't work. --- linux-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686/drivers/net/r8169.c +++ disable-autoneg/drivers/net/r8169.c @@ -2814,7 +2814,8 @@ * rtl8169_set_speed_xmii takes good care of th...

Hi ! Kenrel 2.6.21 (kernel.org) Patch lguest-2.6.21-254.patch Distro Slackware 11.0 GCC 3.4.6 GLIBC 2.3.6 HW model name : AMD Duron(tm) procu{s{ Module Size Used by tun 7680 0 lg 54600 0 just started playing with lguest - patching, compiling and booting the host-kernel goes ok - compiling lguest is ok as well after

Hi ! Kenrel 2.6.21 (kernel.org) Patch lguest-2.6.21-254.patch Distro Slackware 11.0 GCC 3.4.6 GLIBC 2.3.6 HW model name : AMD Duron(tm) procu{s{ Module Size Used by tun 7680 0 lg 54600 0 just started playing with lguest - patching, compiling and booting the host-kernel goes ok - compiling lguest is ok as well after

I have recently moved our asterisk server from our LAN to a Debian Lenny server (Asterisk 1.4.21.2~dfsg-3 ) with a public IP outside our network. Our phones are behind a natted firewall. An ITSP provides a PSTN to SIP termination for incoming calls Public ITSP -->Asterisk server-->Natted firewall-->extension (192.168.1.x) Everything works fine (incoming/outgoing audio etc.) except