Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1007280".
Did you mean:
100720
2009 Nov 19
7
[LLVMdev] Google's Go
On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
>
>> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's
>> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler.
>
> I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself...
Compared to a compiler in the same category as PCC, whose pinnacle of optimization is doing register allocation? I'm not