search for: 100695

Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...133535 5 0.02 133563 btTriangleShapeEx.ll 33 97921 1 0.02 97621 1 0.01 97800 btTypedConstraint.ll 21 41626 0 0.01 41608 0 0.01 41608 btUniformScalingShape.ll 23 56966 0 0.02 56948 0 0.02 49323 btUnionFind.ll 28 47280 0 0.01 47262 0 0.01 47262 btUniversalConstraint.ll 53 104617 3 0.02 102578 3 0.02 100695 btVoronoiSimplexSolver.ll 34 199560 1 0.02 198086 1 0.03 198257 btWheelInfo.ll 12 32435 0 0.01 32417 0 0.01 32588 Bubblesort.ll 5 12018 0 0.01 11999 0 0.01 11999 buffer.ll 2 19239 0 0.01 19209 0 0.01 19209 build2.ll 16 20435 0 0.01 20419 0 0.01 20419 build.ll 2 5879 0 0.01 5863 0 0.01 5863 BuiltinT...