search for: 10037

...| | | | sql-statement | | help [tablename] | | quit | | | +---------------------------------------+ [Oct 14 10:06:16] WARNING[10037][C-00000003]: res_odbc.c:645 ast_odbc_prepare_and_execute: SQL Execute returned an error -1: 42S02: [MySQL][ODBC 5.2(w) Driver][mysqld-5.6.12]Table 'asterisk.voicemessages' doesn't exist (86) [Oct 14 10:06:16] WARNING[10037][C-00000003]: res_odbc.c:657 ast_odbc_prepare_and_execute: SQL...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10037 Summary: do_mknod fails to create socket file Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.or...

Hi When I make a call from the outside to asterisk and the call is asnwered, all is OK, but when I make a call from the outside to asterisk and hangup before the call is answered, you got this WARNING in the console: Jul 6 19:33:08 WARNING[10037]: channel.c:1521 ast_read: Exception flag set on 'UniCall/2-1', but no exception handler Jul 6 19:33:08 WARNING[10037]: channel.c:1521 ast_read: Exception flag set on 'UniCall/2-1', but no exception handler . . . Jul 6 19:33:08 WARNING[10037]: channel.c:1521 ast_read: Exception fl...

I have an incoming 800-number over IAX from Teliax and I'm experiencing the large packet loss on connection. When a call comes in there is no ring tone and the first few words of the welcome message are cut off, regardless of the delay I set. Standard call (not 800-number) coming over IAX with the same provider works just fine only the tall free number. So it seems there are some packet loss

...an_sip.c:9927 sip_reg_timeout: -- Registration for '17470121145 at proxy01.sipphone.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #30) [2009-04-26 15:01:00] WARNING[1844]: acl.c:376 ast_get_ip_or_srv: Unable to lookup 'proxy01.sipphone.com' [2009-04-26 15:01:00] WARNING[1844]: chan_sip.c:10037 transmit_register: Probably a DNS error for registration to 1747yyyxxxx at proxy01.sipphone.com, trying REGISTER again (after 20 seconds) but ping works: ping proxy01.sipphone.com PING northamerica.sipphone.com (198.65.166.131) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from northamerica.sipphone.com (198....

Hello, I currently splitting a file into individual files (time series each separated into one file), the file I read in skips the first four lines and extracts the data columns I need. I was wondering if there is a way for R to automatically scan and separate the files based on the head information? The header delineates the observation with a 254 space time space day space month space

...66 10019 10007 10022 10023 10024 3000009 3000034 3000000 @DC1:~# wbinfo -r james 10000 3000141 3000223 3000224 10031 3000368 3000030 3000004 3000005 3000008 10043 10009 10053 10010 10011 10012 10013 10015 3000031 10034 10032 10033 3000451 10017 10019 10007 10022 10023 10024 10025 10026 10030 10036 10037 10038 10039 10040 3000007 10041 10042 10044 3000515 10045 3000584 3000009 3000034 3000000 -- -- James

...<NA> G NA 25 10029 G <NA> G NA 26 10031 G <NA> G NA 27 10032 A <NA> A NA 28 10033 <NA> NA 29 10035 A <NA> A NA 30 10037 A <NA> A NA 31 10038 <NA> A NA A 32 10039 <NA> A NA A

...ish:*:1033:2003::/home/ATLANTA/trish:/bin/false On the Member Server > root at louise:/etc/samba# wbinfo -i 'ATLANTA\rob' > ATLANTA\rob:*:10020:10001:Robert Steinmetz,,,:/home/ATLANTA/rob:/bin/bash > root at louise:/etc/samba# wbinfo -i 'ATLANTA\trish' > ATLANTA\trish:*:10037:10001::/home/ATLANTA/trish:/bin/bash Note the different UID and GID -- Robert Steinmetz, AIA Principal Steinmetz & Associates

Hi All, I am a newbie in Ruby-Rails. Actually we are using postgre SQL and Ruby application to access the DB. I have made the controller and the model classes. My database.yml contains: development: adapter: postgresql database: test username: poc password: poc host: localhost:5000 test: adapter: postgresql database: test username: poc password: poc host: localhost:5000

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Tags: patch mavisd-new uses SPAMMY since 2.4.1: http://www.mail-archive.com/amavis-user at lists.sourceforge.net/msg05055.html patch attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux

...t-prd-lecsysteme-imax),10084(gint-prd-lecdgpar-interne),10083(gint-app-lecproji pact),10077(gint-app-lecdgpar-bd),10063(gint-prd-lecdgpar),10050(gint-prd-lecsysteme-gpic-inventaire),10048(gint-prd-lecsonda e-rev_loi-reg),10047(gint-prd-lecdgppb),10046(gint-app-lecdgpar),10039(rdgppb-utilisateursbd),10037(gint-prd-lecdgppb-bd),100 8(gint-prd-lectelecommunication),10016(gint-prd-lecinfojuridique),10006(gint-prd-lecdgpar-bd),10001(BUILTIN\users) # lsuser also returns the "normal/full" list, as the previous command. Is there anyone having success with winbind on this system /release ? Rega...

...nt. Because of this, access is denied to the share defined above. [2004/12/15 14:28:20, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(505) UNIX token of user 10002 Primary group is 10000 and contains 8 supplementary groups Group[ 0]: 10000 Group[ 1]: 10020 Group[ 2]: 10035 Group[ 3]: 10037 Group[ 4]: 10039 Group[ 5]: 10042 Group[ 6]: 10507 Group[ 7]: 10508 We've noticed that after some time - and it certainly seems to vary - access is granted. Until then, the user is denied access and is challenged for credentials. *** Is there some GID cache that I'm not awar...

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dnsmasq A dnsmasq log about DHCP events has the interface name in it. Interface names are allowed to have a dash (-) in them, but the logcheck filter does not have the dash in it. Please add the dash. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500,

...nd checked possible collision with UNIX groups. Samba doesn't give me IDs like 30000, bud something different. Look at my sysvol: getfacl /var/lib/samba/sysvol/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: var/lib/samba/sysvol/ # owner: 1037 # group: 544 user::rwx user:10037:rwx user:15543:r-x user:15544:rwx user:15554:r-x group::rwx group:544:rwx group:BUILTIN\134server\040operators:r-x group:15544:rwx group:15554:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:1037:rwx default:user:15543:r-x default:user:15544:rwx default:user:15554:r-x default:group::--- def...

...1m25.212s user 1m25.217s user 1m25.219s user 1m25.233s user 1m25.243s user 1m25.245s user 1m25.259s user 1m25.560s ratio of the two best CPU times: pixxi:~ ggreif$ expr 854040000 / 85127 10032 ratio of the two second best CPU times: pixxi:~ ggreif$ expr 854530000 / 85132 10037 It looks like we have a degradation of 0.3%. The <system> and <real> times show no surprises at all. There is one important change still missing from the use-diet branch, viz. the capacity of the BitcodeReaderValueList is computed very naively with the new algorithm at each push_back....

On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Dan Gohman wrote: >> So, my idea is that these changes are performance neutral. I strongly agree with Dan that we need to measure performance to ensure there is no significant performance regression. >> I hope that this is interesting, but I'd like to ask anybody who is >> comfortable with performance testing to help provide some hard

...= Yes winbind enum users = Yes [data] comment = Samba data folder path = /samba/data read only = No create mask = 0740 directory mask = 0750 guest ok = Yes ************ Check the Unix name resolution ************ getent passwd jdoe jdoe:x:10037:10002:John DOE:/home/jdoe:/bin/sh getent group grp2 grp2::10004:myadmin,jdoe,demo1,demo2,demo3 ************ I can check that Samba can resolve if the user is member of the group ************ /usr/local/samba/bin/net ads user info jdoe grp2 grp1 /usr/local/samba/bin/wbinfo -G 10004 S-1-5-21-2...

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

...3 9554 9574 9575 9577 9593 9599 9601 9610 9611 9612 9613 9618 9619 9625 9627 9641 9642 9659 9685 9694 9735 9737 9772 9773 9774 9775 9776 9777 9781 9795 9802 9803 9806 9827 9829 9844 9866 9867 9875 9914 9949 9954 9957 9958 9959 9960 9961 9962 9967 9968 9969 9970 9986 9987 9988 9996 10003 10004 10006 10037 10040 10041 10043 10044 10046 10048 10049 10053 10072 10107 10121 10132 10136 10138 10140 10142 10143 10144 10146 10158 10276 10306 10336 10343 10353 10366 10389 10390 10400 10401 10413 10421 10429 10511 10709 10710 10711 10712 10713 10714 10715 10717 10719 10720 10728 10778 10779 10799 10800 10801...