search for: 100329

...h a rational though. - Chris Matthews: LNT / llvmlab-bisect needs currently a sequential ID number http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049886.html - Mehmet Erol Sanliturk: "I consider revision numbers as only a disastrous design” http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100329.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100329.html> (+some criticism of the GitHub UI). - Scott Warren: "find [git] immature, hard to use, and unreliable.” http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100514.html About monorepo vs submodules: - [multiple people]...

...> - Chris Matthews: LNT / llvmlab-bisect needs currently a sequential ID > number http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049886.html > - Mehmet Erol Sanliturk: "I consider revision numbers as only a disastrous > design” http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100329.html (+some > criticism of the GitHub UI). > - Scott Warren: "find [git] immature, hard to use, and unreliable.” > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100514.html > > About monorepo vs submodules: > > - [multiple people]: need the ability to bisect (right no...

Hi Justin, Firstly I really appreciate you taking the mantle and pushing this forward! Like Justin B I'll be bowing out after this. I thought it important because I don't believe you'll build consensus in this thread. I think the best that can be hoped for is opposition to give up fighting; advantages are to be had on both sides by different types of user and we've seen that many

Maybe we can hit the pause button on this issue of a survey vs consensus-building. I think it's a distraction from the main issue here, and it makes it harder for everyone else to participate in the thread. That said, I really do think that perspectives like Justin B's below are important. That is, if people have a problem with the monorepo, it is useful they can join the thread and say