Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "1000u".
Did you mean:
1000
2016 Jan 11
0
[HCL] POWERCOM PCM SPD-1000U
Hello !
Could you be so kind to hint me about supporting Powercom PCM SPD-1000U by
nut ?
I didn't find this model in your HCL. Do you have plans for adding this
model in your HCL or maybe I can use some similar driver ?
I tried to connect my SPD-1000U with FreeNAS using another drivers for
Powercom from HCL, that use nut, but without success, seems because it's
not i...
2004 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
...l13_no_exit:
l8_indvar = l8_indvar__PHI_TEMPORARY;
l14_tmp_2E_4 = &Array[l8_indvar];
l7_tmp_2E_7 = *l14_tmp_2E_4;
*l14_tmp_2E_4 = (l7_tmp_2E_7 + l7_X);
l8_indvar_2E_next = l8_indvar + 1u;
l8_indvar__PHI_TEMPORARY = l8_indvar_2E_next; /* for PHI node */
if ((l8_indvar_2E_next == 1000u)) {
goto l13_return;
} else {
goto l13_no_exit;
}
} while (1); /* end of syntactic loop 'no_exit' */
l13_return:
return;
}
Instead of:
> void test(int l7_X) {
> unsigned l8_indvar;
> unsigned l8_indvar__PHI_TEMPORARY;
> int *l14_tmp_2E_5;
> int l7_t...
2009 Dec 28
2
DeviceKit-power
My UPS Powercom WOW-1000U does greatly work with NUT, but not
auto-cofigurable...
This UPS is not usb-hid ups, and works well with this settings in NUT:
[powercom]
desc = "powercom"
driver = powercom
port = "/dev/serial/by-id/usb-POWERCOM_CO.__LTD._USB_to_Serial-if00-port0"
type = IMP
l...
2004 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Patrick Flanagan wrote:
> I was able to run through all the C/C++ benchmarks in SPEC using LLVM.
> I'm on OS X 10.3.3. I did a quick comparison between LLVM (latest from
> CVS as of 4/27) and gcc 3.3 (Apple's build 20030304). For simplicity's
> sake, the only flag I used was -O3 for each compiler and I was using
> the C backend to generate native
2004 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
I was able to run through all the C/C++ benchmarks in SPEC using LLVM.
I'm on OS X 10.3.3. I did a quick comparison between LLVM (latest from
CVS as of 4/27) and gcc 3.3 (Apple's build 20030304). For simplicity's
sake, the only flag I used was -O3 for each compiler and I was using
the C backend to generate native code for PPC.
Most of the LLVM results were close to gcc
2004 Apr 14
1
PBX <-> AST <-> AST <-> PBX
...e i get confused, i need 4 FXS ports and 4 FXO ports for that ?
or with just FXS im fine?)
What i want to know if this is basically a doable idea, because if it is i
can think about investing the money and time to put up a demo of it and try
to sell it. What i dont to happen is that i invest about 1000u$s computer
and telephony hardware to find out what i want is IMPOSSIBLE.
Could someone please tell me that im not crazy or trying to reinvent the
wheel ?
Thanks a lot.
Ezequiel Golub.
2004 May 04
6
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
...var_2E_next;
l8_indvar__PHI_TEMPORARY = 0u; /* for PHI node */
l13_no_exit:
l8_indvar = l8_indvar__PHI_TEMPORARY;
l14_tmp_2E_5 = &Array[l8_indvar];
l7_tmp_2E_9 = *l14_tmp_2E_5;
*l14_tmp_2E_5 = (l7_tmp_2E_9 + l7_X);
l8_indvar_2E_next = l8_indvar + 1u;
if (!(l8_indvar_2E_next == 1000u)) {
l8_indvar__PHI_TEMPORARY = l8_indvar_2E_next; /* for PHI node */
goto l13_no_exit;
}
return;
}
This has exactly the same operations in the loop, so GCC should produce
the same code, right? Wrong:
_test:
mflr r4
bcl 20,31,"L00000000001$pb"
"L000000...