search for: 1000ms

...morning I saw this message a few times on the Asterisk command line. The lagged cause garbled phone calls. Is my network to slow? Or is there something else going on? Aug 9 09:40:21 NOTICE[6395]: chan_sip.c:9929 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'netlogic' is now TOO LAGGED! (1050ms / 1000ms) Aug 9 09:40:55 NOTICE[6395]: chan_sip.c:9923 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'netlogic' is now REACHABLE! (17ms / 1000ms) Aug 9 09:41:56 NOTICE[6395]: chan_sip.c:9929 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'netlogic' is now TOO LAGGED! (1017ms / 1000ms) Aug 9 09:42:17 NOTICE[6395]: cha...

...ELT is faster than SILK? */ opus_encoder_ctl(enc, OPUS_SET_FORCE_MODE(MODE_CELT_ONLY)); D. generate 20ms PCM sample data (Cosine wave with amplitude 0x6000 and frequency about 1150 Hz) E. encode the PCM data and decode it immediately, count the CPU usages. F. repeat until reach the duration time (1000ms or 10000ms) G. The summary of STM32F407 Test Result as below: Mode Sample Chan Freq. Duration Encode + Decode = Total FLOAT 48kHz 2 1150 1000ms 2735ms + 3367ms = 6102ms FIXED 48kHz 2 1150 1000ms 2112ms + 1543ms = 3698ms FIXED 48kHz 1 1150 1000ms 1312ms + 911ms = 2249ms...

<style>table.customTableClassName {margin-bottom: 10px;border-collapse: collapse;display: table;}.customTableClassName td, .customTableClassName th {border: 1px solid #ddd;}</style><div id="write-custom-write" tabindex="0" style="font-size: 12px; font-family: 宋体; outline: medium none currentcolor;"><p style="margin:0px;">Dear

...regularly to check that the device is still online. If the device does not answer within the configured (or default) period (in ms) Asterisk considers the device off-line for future calls. " So; qualify=1000|yes means query for SIP OPTIONS, then take then unregister the peer if no response in 1000ms. But, how do you set/determine the frequency at which a peer is queried? Does this go on indefinitely after a peer fails to respond to make sure the peer is re-registered when available again? Can the interval be set on a per peer basis? Any documentation on this that you can point me to? Thx!

...w the purpose is to FW calls through PSTN. Assuming I have a client who is calling from Japan to my main switch in UK and he is calling China, (japan have latency around 500ms to UK and 100ms to China), how asterisk will deal with this call?? Will his latency be JAPN->UK + UK->China (around 1000ms !) or only from Japan to China??? Please let me know. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20091006/6e1b7bde/attachment.htm

On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:11:49PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:07:09AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > severity 200435 normal > > thanks > > > > I received this bug report from a Debian user. I can't think of any reason > > offhand why the command line tool would work while the xmms plugin would > > fail. > ... >

...retry in 1 second (using usleep(1000)). I also made an it log every time it was going to retry and if it fails, log the failure. the code looks like this: if(write(c->socket, bufp, length) < 0) { syslog(LOG_ERR, _("Sending meta data to %s (%s) failed will retry is 1000ms"), c->name, c->hostname); usleep(1000); if(write(c->socket, bufp, length) < 0) { syslog(LOG_ERR, _("Sending meta data to %s (%s) failed: %s"), c->name,...

...across this page from Digium: http://kb.digium.com/entry/6/ This suggests adjusting a variable in zaptel.h, as I don't use zaptel, can this same logic be applied to DAHDI somewhere? My theory is that the "disconnect supervision" signal coming from the phone company may be less than 1000ms. Desperately trying to fix this..... Thanks, Stephen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090925/fe6ba300/attachment.htm

Hi, My laptop runs a local IMAP server so that I'm immune from breaking my mail client, and when playing around with powertop I discovered that Dovecot (in particular imap-login) wakes up every 1000ms and then every 50ms even when no clients are connected. A bit of stracing shows this: gettimeofday({1180875699, 667917}, NULL) = 0 <0.000010> poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL}, {fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI|P...

On 2016-08-09 10:06, Faheem Muhammad wrote: > trip time and Call Setup time of SIP Requests. > In case of GSM Network with high delay you need to set the T1 timer a > higher value like 1000ms (500 ms default). Similarly you can reduce the > Call setup time by configuring 'T2' upto you choice as per you telephony > network. Configure t1min, timert1 and timerb according to your network. No, that won't work. First ? 't1min', 'timert1' and 'timerb'...

...PU spikes to 50%. This is "system" utilization, not userland. I assume it's in a wcfxs interrupt. The number of interrupts stays constant at about 2004 during each spike, leading me to the conclusion that the TDM card is holding an interrupt for 500ms every three seconds (50% of 1000ms is 500ms). This is a disaster for spandsp and VoIP in general. When I unload the wcfxs module, CPU idle goes back to a constant 100%. The TDM22B card is REV E/F, and I've tried it with several different cards. Fedora Core 3 with linux-2.6.9 downloaded from kernel.org (a stock kernel). T...

...time with the samba DC.??? From what I can tell they are not able to get a response from the DC.? For example, where the DC is named athena: >w32tm /monitor /computers:athena athena[10.10.1.10:123] ? ICMP: 0ms delay ? NTP: error ERROR_TIMEOUT - no response from server in 1000ms From a Linux machine there is also no response: ntpdate -q athena 24 Oct 16:47:41 ntpdate[33581]: no server suitable for synchronization found Here is the DC /etc/ntpsec/ntp.conf: # Where to retrieve the time from server 0.pool.ntp.org???? iburst prefer server 1.pool.ntp.org???? i...

On 17.11.2019 15:58, Sonic wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 5:37 AM Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: >> I'm not sure I understand your setup. It seems like you are running >> Chrony on the host only and you just share the socket with the >> container, no chrony running there. > Yes, you have it correct. That's exactly what I'm doing. >

...IP). We've noticed a curious behavior in chan_sip that doesn't persist with chan_pjsip. When examining the packet capture, we're seeing the SSRC changing constantly on the call. At first it happens over a variable interval (15s 6s etc) but eventually it ends up changing exactly every 1000ms. Every time the SSRC changes, it causes a very minor but noticeable gap in audio. The fact that it's changing on this exact interval makes me think there is an explicit setting somewhere, or it's intentional behavior in the code. We do NOT see this behavior with chan_pjsip, all other thin...

Hi, We have been migrating our PBX system from Asterisk 1.8 and chan_sip to Asterisk 13 and chan_pjsip. Things are mostly, ok, but now I have stumbled on a behaviour difference I don't like. With chan_pjsip when a phone went unexpectedly offline (Ethernet cable disconnected) Asterisk would detect this quickly (through the 'qualify' pings), mark the phone as 'Unavailable' and

...dwidth of 128kbit/s. My goal is to favour small packets like ACKs and interactive services like ssh; in other words, I want to achieve low lantency. If there are some big packets going over the wire, everything works fine. But if there are many small packets saturating my uplink, I get pings of 1000ms and above. To minimize this effect I''ve set the HTB qdisc rate to 100kbit/s. But even now, throttling my uplink to lower than 80% of physical bandwidth, pings go up to 800ms in some cases. Today I''ve noticed, that two additional parameters have been added recently to the HTB-...

...ing 192.168.101.55 PING 192.168.101.55 (192.168.101.55) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.101.55: icmp_seq=1 ttl=127 time=0.361 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.101.55: icmp_seq=2 ttl=127 time=0.354 ms --- 192.168.101.55 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1000ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.354/0.357/0.361/0.019 ms But when a try to stablish the relationship, it simply cannot find the PDC or the other domain, when issuing the command: net rpc trustdom establish OTHERDOMAIN Samba quits saying it can't find the other domain PDC, so i supposed it is a wins...

....1.3 # /sbin/ifconfig $INTERFACE 172.16.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 The occuring errors are: * Ping from h182 (172.16.1.2) and h183 (172.16.1.3) to h181 (172.16.1.1) is not possible * Ping from h181 to h182 and h183 and between h182 and h183 are possible, but extremely slow (some about 1000ms; ping to public IP is about 10ms) When I start tinc with tincd -n netname -d5 -D everything seems normal, many PINGs and PONGs are displayed. In route -n it is displayed on all hosts: 172.16.1.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 vpn0 When stopping tincd on h182 or...

Guys. Anybody doing ChanisAvail on IAX2 channels? Im trying to do this: exten => s,7,ChanIsAvail(IAX2/anton:intrudercom@armando-gw) But I get that the chan is unavailable eventhough I can make calls to that channel. Is there any chatch? The channels is defined as peer and Ialso tried doing a register on iax.conf for that channel. Everything is registering ok and I CAN make the call. Any

...4a17 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c @@ -36,6 +36,13 @@ #include <linux/sort.h> #include <linux/hmm.h> +/* + * When waiting for mmu notifiers we need some kind of time out otherwise we + * could potentialy wait for ever, 1000ms ie 1s sounds like a long time to + * wait already. + */ +#define NOUVEAU_RANGE_FAULT_TIMEOUT 1000 + struct nouveau_svm { struct nouveau_drm *drm; struct mutex mutex; @@ -475,6 +482,51 @@ nouveau_svm_fault_cache(struct nouveau_svm *svm, fault->inst, fault->addr, fault->access); }...