search for: 1000mbit

...at the Apache model for throttling, thanks. I was going for tc because was going to try to add additional shaping to non-apache traffic once I got it working correctly. Thanks, -Ryan Power tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1:99 parent 1:1 leaf 99: prio 0 quantum 3000 rate 900000Kbit ceil 1000Mbit burst 451350b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 501375b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 48695 bytes 398 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 2704bit 2pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 398 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 4326 ctokens: 4325 class htb 1:1 root rate 1000Mbit ceil 1000Mb...

...pe my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps, while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that I''m using is as follows: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 99 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000mbit ceil 1000mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:99 htb rate 900mbit ceil 1000mbit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:99 handle 99: sfq tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip...

...lt;--USB2--> NAS Highly unlikely to work - the drive won't have a Firewire to USB bridge. Having the two different ports is to allow the drive to be connected to *a* host with either Firewire *OR* USB. > The other option is > > HD <--FW800--> Computer <--USB2 or Ethernet 1000Mbit --> NAS If you use a network connection then you've still got that network layer. If connected via USB, does it appear to the host as "just a drive" ? If so then use that. > I also might have a look at ditto or CpMac. Also consider Carbon Copy Cloner - it has a free trial.

Hi All, I''m configuring my natting-firewall to do some tc shaping. Some traffic has to be shaped on 30mbit, some on 10mbit all the others are unlimited. The configuring and filtering works correctly. The traffic that is shaped at 30mbit is correct, but the traffic that is shapped at 10mbit only gets to 100KB/sec. It is on a device configured with bonding (both in and out interface).

I''m trying to shape each machine on an interface to 256k each, but I''m getting stuck and only able to shape an entire interface to 256k. What should I be doing differently here? tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100MBit ceil 100MBit tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 110:

...urs. The busy site had a few peak periods and presumably used up all the traffic allotment. Perhaps tc remembers the traffic between invocations? I then tried a slightly more sophisticated setup: tc qdisc del dev $DEV root tc qdisc add dev $NIC root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 1000mbit tc class add dev $NIC parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate $RATE_PROBLEM allot 1500 prio 5 bounded # isolated tc filter add dev $NIC parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst $IP flowid 1:1 Unfortunately, I still don''t get any traffic flowing while tc is active now. Seem...

...https 1:30 is P2P as detected by ipp2p 1:20 is the rest As you can see 1:10 hasn''t even dropped a packet. Though when I ping the our Internet gateway I get terrible packet loss, at least 10%. But why, I don''t see any packets dropped in 1:10? Downlink: class htb 2:1 root rate 1000Mbit ceil 1000Mbit burst 126500b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 126500b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 510719706792 bytes 662575747 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 25671Kbit 4333pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 4926904 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 1012 ctokens: 1012 class ht...

...on a 100MBit/s ethernet connection when rsync'ing a lager number on _new_ files. I don't have much exeprience with rsync. I'dd just like to know if thi is an acceptable bw usage and what could be the limiting factors... in order to try to increase this speed. I'm considering using 1000MBit/s dedicated connections and so I'dd like to know if I will or won't get faster operations, or if I will still have this 20MBit bottleneck. Furthermore... is there a way to ask rsync to be slower ?!? thank you joao

...y sure how to set that one up... The reason I prefer the external machine, is that the recording have to be moved to an external machine anyway. Although I've come across a post somewhere, talking about recording to ramdisk and then move the files over a crosscable directly to another disk over 1000mbit. Which sound nice as well... What do you advise for bringing serverload down and get rid of the harddisk bottleneck? Is a ramdisk a better solution then an external machine? And if so, why? Sorry about this pro-con question, but I cannot find an answer which compares these pro-cons anywhere. tha...

...s the LAN and INET1_IF is my internet connection. /etc/shorewall/tcdevices: #NUMBER: IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH OPTIONS REDIRECTED #INTERFACE INTERFACES $MID_IF_TC:$MID_IF 0 1000mbit $INET1_IF_TC:$INET1_IF - 2mbit classify $INET1_IFB_TC:$INET1_IFB_IF - 12mbit - $INET1_IF /etc/shorewall/tcclasses: #INTERFACE:CLASS MARK RATE: CEIL PRIORITY OPTIONS #...

...our existing switches. We have since replaced the network hardware in both the main server room, and the network branch with which all the users encountering this problem exist. The network now consists of NetGear Layer 2 Managed switches, (1- 12 PORT SFP switch in the server room operating at 1000Mbit full duplex with 2 independant fiber links to (2) 24 Port 10/100 switches with 1000mbit fiber uplinks via GBICs). Figuring that perhaps the issue was indeed out network disconnecting users, and thus leaving a stale smbd processes locking the file they were using and escalating to 99% cpu in som...

...TTCP transfers random data between two computers, to purely test the network transfer rate -- not using either computer's hard drive whatsoever. This seems about right. From what I've read elsewhere, it appears gigabit typically performs at about 40% of it's theoretical transfer rate of 1000Mbit/sec unless very expensive switches and NICs are purchased. Using hdparm, I get around 640Mbit/sec (80MB/sec) on both the client's SATA drive and the new server's SATA drive. Transferring a 700MB AVI file from Windows to the samba network share runs between 75Mbit/sec to 280Mbit/sec (9.4MB...

...ng. Could I setup HTB better than below? Should I reduce eth1''s queue length (now 1000)? If yes, how? Thanks. Daniel -------- 8< -------- INT=eth1 # creating root and root class tc qdisc add dev $INT root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev $INT parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000mbit prio 0 # class for not forwarded traffic (and sfq leaf) tc class add dev $INT parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb \ rate 997mbit ceil 1000mbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev $INT parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 # class for forwarded traffic tc class add dev $INT parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb \ rat...

Hi folks, I''m having an issue with rsync between my firewall and an internal box. It seems to be a shorewall issue (or correctly speaking, an issue with my shorewall config) because if I disable shorewall my rsync works fine. And I just can''t find it documented anywhere what I need to do. I have rules like this : root@userver:/etc/shorewall# grep -i Rsync rules

Hello Maybe someone could direct us to right solution with the problem descibed below. We tried different trick bo no success stories. We have a development cluster based on Dell R815 servers (+-30) and a storage server - Netapp FAS 3240 runnig Data Ontap 8.1p2. We have some 100 virtual servers - we use Xen 4.1 for virtualisation. A basics OS is Debian Squeeze with some backports packages

Den 2016-01-26 kl. 09:06, skrev Simon Hobson: >>> >>The other option is >>> >> >>> >>HD <--FW800--> Computer <--USB2 or Ethernet 1000Mbit --> NAS >> > >> >If you use a network connection then you've still got that network layer. > Just thinking a bit more about that ... > > Is your normal setup : > NAS --ethernet--> Computer hosting A > or > NAS --USB--> Computer hosting A &g...

Hello list, I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from Shorewall-4.0.2. I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list can help me or explain this situation. I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH # $EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit $INT1_IF 500mbit

...DROP            info ovh     all     DROP            info all     all     REJECT          info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /etc/shorewall/tcinterfaces ---------------------------------------------------------------------- eth0            internal        1000mbit        1000mbit eth1            external        4mbit           4mbit tun0            internal        2mbit           1mbit eth2            external        6mbit           796kbit eth3            external        6610kbit        796kbit --------------------------------------------------------------...

...09 Sep 23 12:21:09 wader2 kernel: ---[ end trace 69b6c5e494cffe4d ]--- Sep 23 12:21:10 wader2 kernel: 0000:04:00.0: eth0: Error reading PHY register Sep 23 12:21:10 wader2 kernel: e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX The last line falsely reports the link to be 1000Mbit but it is actually 100Mbit. Same does ethtool. Bringing down the interface with ifconfig eth0 down and then ifconfig eth0 up does not help. A reboot gets the interface back to normal. The problem returns after some minutes, hours or a day. Any ideas? Regards .......Volker

...First I will connect the NAS directly to the computer (Do you recommend USB2 or 1 Gb Ethernet? Or should I daisy chain external HD and NAS? Then it would look like this: Computer <--FW800--> HD <--USB2--> NAS The other option is HD <--FW800--> Computer <--USB2 or Ethernet 1000Mbit --> NAS But I still must say it is weird that rsync seems slower than Finder. I also might have a look at ditto or CpMac. On 2016-01-25 15:50, Simon Hobson wrote: > dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba.org at gmail.com wrote: > >> It is exactly as I wrote. On a network volume (A) a &qu...