Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1000920".
Did you mean:
1000.20
2008 Oct 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 problem? (resend)
On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not
>> the value.
>
> Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can
> understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining whether
> this is legal or not requires reading the language standard.
> Hopefully
> a