Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "100087".
Did you mean:
100084
2010 Apr 02
0
[LLVMdev] VMKit assertion failure
Hi Konrad,
Yes, there has been an incompatibility change recently between LLVM and
VMKit. Please use revision 100087 of LLVM until I find a workaround.
Also, running on Snow Leopard is untested (VMKit does not have support for
GC on 64bits), but should work without a GC. You can also try to compile on
32bits.
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen at fastmail.net>wro...
2010 Apr 02
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit assertion failure
Hi everyone,
I wanted to have a closer look at VMKit because I would like to play with modifications to a JVM. I followed the instructions at
http://vmkit.llvm.org/get_started.html
step by step and got everything compiled without much difficulty on my MacBook (running MacOS X 10.6.3). The only modification that I needed to make was to add -L/usr/X11R6/lib to LDFLAGS for compiling the GNU
2010 Apr 02
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit assertion failure
Hi Nicolas,
> Yes, there has been an incompatibility change recently between LLVM and VMKit. Please use revision 100087 of LLVM until I find a workaround.
OK, done.
> Also, running on Snow Leopard is untested (VMKit does not have support for GC on 64bits), but should work without a GC. You can also try to compile on 32bits.
How would I run VMKit without GC?
Compiling for 32 bits is not an attractive option. T...