search for: 100087

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "100087".

Did you mean: 100084
2010 Apr 02
0
[LLVMdev] VMKit assertion failure
Hi Konrad, Yes, there has been an incompatibility change recently between LLVM and VMKit. Please use revision 100087 of LLVM until I find a workaround. Also, running on Snow Leopard is untested (VMKit does not have support for GC on 64bits), but should work without a GC. You can also try to compile on 32bits. Cheers, Nicolas On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen at fastmail.net>wro...
2010 Apr 02
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit assertion failure
Hi everyone, I wanted to have a closer look at VMKit because I would like to play with modifications to a JVM. I followed the instructions at http://vmkit.llvm.org/get_started.html step by step and got everything compiled without much difficulty on my MacBook (running MacOS X 10.6.3). The only modification that I needed to make was to add -L/usr/X11R6/lib to LDFLAGS for compiling the GNU
2010 Apr 02
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit assertion failure
Hi Nicolas, > Yes, there has been an incompatibility change recently between LLVM and VMKit. Please use revision 100087 of LLVM until I find a workaround. OK, done. > Also, running on Snow Leopard is untested (VMKit does not have support for GC on 64bits), but should work without a GC. You can also try to compile on 32bits. How would I run VMKit without GC? Compiling for 32 bits is not an attractive option. T...