Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1000738".
Did you mean:
1000708
2008 Oct 03
3
[LLVMdev] mem2reg optimization
On Thu, October 2, 2008 10:17 am, Nicolas Capens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I haven't had a chance yet to do some accurate profiling, but does anyone
> have some more insight in the use list order? *bump*
I thought this was answered; use lists are not currently in
any intentional order.
>
> It seems very valuable to me (from a performance standpoint) to keep the
> use
>