Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1000659".
Did you mean:
1000658
2008 Sep 30
2
[LLVMdev] Integer handling
OvermindDL1 wrote:
>
> I know why it was removed, and it does make sense, just would be nice
> if there was an option to be able to get two pointer to a specific
> llvm::IntegerType, functionally they would be identical, but for user
> code (hence, my code) would be useful as I could match it for the
> different ones at generate different code for each.
>
Well a language