Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "1000546".
2020 Jul 20
1
Shares stopped working for groups
...ere.
> All "ClearOS" LDAP groups on this system and mine begin at 63000. All
> of what I think od as the Windows built-in groups are somewhere over
> 1000500 e.g:
> [root at server ~]# id clearcenter
> uid=1049(clearcenter) gid=63000(allusers)
> groups=63000(allusers),1000546(guests),1000512(domain_admins),1000513(domain_users),1000514(domain_guests),1000544(administrators),1000545(users),1000547(power_users),1000548(account_operators),1000549(server_operators),1000550(print_operators),1000551(backup_operators),60006(executive),60007(staff),60008(visitors),60009(admin)...
2020 Jul 20
2
Shares stopped working for groups
On 20/07/2020 10:37, Nick Howitt via samba wrote:
> Bump, please.
I have reviewed all the posts in this thread and I 'think' I know what
is going on and also answers a question I asked.
You have in your smb.conf:
unix password sync = Yes
This possibly means that you have a group in /etc/group called allusers
with the ID of 63000
I would replace the line with:
ldap password sync
2020 Jul 20
0
Shares stopped working for groups
...don't
think should be there.
All "ClearOS" LDAP groups on this system and mine begin at 63000. All of
what I think od as the Windows built-in groups are somewhere over
1000500 e.g:
[root at server ~]# id clearcenter
uid=1049(clearcenter) gid=63000(allusers)
groups=63000(allusers),1000546(guests),1000512(domain_admins),1000513(domain_users),1000514(domain_guests),1000544(administrators),1000545(users),1000547(power_users),1000548(account_operators),1000549(server_operators),1000550(print_operators),1000551(backup_operators),60006(executive),60007(staff),60008(visitors),60009(admin)...
2008 Sep 24
3
[LLVMdev] Multi-Instruction Patterns
On Wed, September 24, 2008 12:10 am, Evan Cheng wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:17 PM, David Greene wrote:
>
>> Chris Lattner wrote:
>>> On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:26 AM, David Greene wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are there any examples of using tablegen to generate multiple
>>>> machine
>>>> instructions from a single pattern? Or do these cases