Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1000450".
Did you mean:
1000050
2008 Sep 13
3
[LLVMdev] Overzealous PromoteCastOfAllocation
Hi Dan,
> Changing PromoteCastOfAllocation to not replace aggregate allocas with
> non-aggregate allocas if they have GEP users sounds reasonable to me.
This sounds reasonable indeed, but still a bit arbitrary. Haven't figured out
anything better yet, though.
> Finding the maximum alignment is sometimes still useful though, so
> it would be nice to update the alignment field of