Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "1000351".
Did you mean:
100351
2017 Jul 01
2
LLC Segmentation Fault in Matrix Multiplication
Hello,
when i used clang for matrix multiplication code with i=j=k=1000351, it
successfully generates IR. then i run opt as follows
opt -S -O3 -force-vector-width=64 -force-vector-interleave=32 matn.ll -o
pimmatnl_64_u32_o3.ll
it also worked fine. but when i run llc on the optimized .ll file
llc -x86-asm-syntax=intel pimmatnl_64_u32_o3.ll -o matnl-knl4_intel.s
i get t...
2017 Jul 01
2
LLC Segmentation Fault in Matrix Multiplication
...tor width to >=64, why is that so?
>
> I have to keep it >=64. Please suggest some way?
>
> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 10:47 AM, hameeza ahmed <hahmed2305 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> when i used clang for matrix multiplication code with i=j=k=1000351, it
>> successfully generates IR. then i run opt as follows
>> opt -S -O3 -force-vector-width=64 -force-vector-interleave=32 matn.ll -o
>> pimmatnl_64_u32_o3.ll
>>
>> it also worked fine. but when i run llc on the optimized .ll file
>>
>> llc -x86-asm-synt...
2017 Jul 01
0
LLC Segmentation Fault in Matrix Multiplication
...?
>>
>> I have to keep it >=64. Please suggest some way?
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 10:47 AM, hameeza ahmed <hahmed2305 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> when i used clang for matrix multiplication code with i=j=k=1000351, it
>>> successfully generates IR. then i run opt as follows
>>> opt -S -O3 -force-vector-width=64 -force-vector-interleave=32 matn.ll
>>> -o pimmatnl_64_u32_o3.ll
>>>
>>> it also worked fine. but when i run llc on the optimized .ll file
>>>
&g...
2008 Sep 08
0
[LLVMdev] adde/addc
Richard Pennington wrote:
> My target doesn't support 64 bit arithmetic, so I'd like to supply
> definitions for adde/addc. The problem is I can't seem to figure out the
> magic. Here's an example of what I need to generate:
>
> # two i64s in r5/r6 and r7/r8
> # result in r1/r2, carry in r3
>
> # adde
> add r2, r6, r8
> cmpltu r3, r2, r6 #