search for: 100024

...p 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100021 1 udp 55394 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 55394 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 55394 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 33704 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 33704 nlockmgr 100021 4 tcp 33704 nlockmgr 100024 1 udp 786 status 100024 1 tcp 789 status Does anyone have any tips on how to get this to work the way I'm asking it to? regards ~ GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B

...lockd 32769/udp mountd 892/udp statd 662/udp [root at centos sy rpcinfo -p seems fine (although I understand that is not relevent with nfs4) [root at centos sysconfig]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100024 1 udp 662 status 100024 1 tcp 662 status 100011 1 udp 875 rquotad 100011 2 udp 875 rquotad 100011 1 tcp 875 rquotad 100011 2 tcp 875 rquotad 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100003 4...

...setup Linux as NFS Server and exported /home as nfs export. [root@ldap root]# cat /etc/exports /home 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0(ro,nohide,insecure,sync) [root@ldap root]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100024 1 udp 32768 status 100024 1 tcp 32768 status 391002 2 tcp 32769 sgi_fam 100011 1 udp 639 rquotad 100011 2 udp 639 rquotad 100011 1 tcp 642 rquotad 100011 2 tcp 642 rquotad 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100003...

...rpcinfo -p program vers proto port service 100000 4 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 3 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 4 udp 111 portmapper 100000 3 udp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100024 1 udp 54233 status 100024 1 tcp 32813 status 100005 2 udp 20048 mountd 100005 2 tcp 20048 mountd 100003 4 tcp 2049 nfs 100003 4 udp 2049 nfs 100021 3 udp 56990 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 40572 nlockmgr # systemctl sta...

...0x28:0xc6aadc40 frame pointer = 0x28:0xc6aadc40 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 22 (irq12: ahc0) [thread pid 22 tid 100024 ] Stopped at xpt_freeze_devq+0x18: movl 0x4(%eax),%eax db> tr Tracing pid 22 tid 100024 td 0xc1619600 xpt_freeze_devq(c16c8300,1) at xpt_freeze_devq+0x18 ahc_handle_seqint(c1583800,71) at ahc_handle_seqint+0x224 ahc_platform_intr(c1583800) at ahc_platform_intr+0x20a ithread_execute_han...

...4 udp 599 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 599 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 599 nlockmgr 100021 4 tcp 599 nlockmgr 100011 1 udp 598 rquotad 100011 2 udp 598 rquotad 100011 1 tcp 598 rquotad 100011 2 tcp 598 rquotad 100024 1 udp 595 status 100024 1 tcp 595 status > This means the number of connections will not match the number "Sending > a TCP RST ..." messages. Ok, but without smb it should be doubled, right? > The one thing I would ask you to check for this part is wheth...

Hi Uli, [Sorry for slow response, life is busy...] On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:06:26 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > we are using ctdb 4.15.5 on RHEL8 (Kernel > 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64) to provide NFS v3 (via tcp) to RHEL7/8 > clients. Whenever an ip takeover happens most clients report > something like this: > [Mon Feb 13 12:21:22

...s:x:100013:TEST\administrator TEST\ras and ias servers:x:100014: TEST\dnsadmins:x:100015: TEST\dnsupdateproxy:x:100016: TEST\group1:x:100017: TEST\group2:x:100018: TEST\group3:x:100019: TEST\group4:x:100020: TEST\group5:x:100021: TEST\group6:x:100022: TEST\group7:x:100023: TEST\group8:x:100024: TEST\group9:x:100025: TEST\group10:x:100026: TEST\group11:x:100027: CHILD\domain computers:x:100030: CHILD\domain controllers:x:100031: CHILD\domain admins:x:100032:CHILD\administrator CHILD\domain users:x:100033: CHILD\domain guests:x:100034: CHILD\group policy creator owners:x:100...

...s.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100169.html) [updates](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100170.html) on the progress of open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend. * Elena Lepilkina has proposed some [enhancement to FileCheck](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100024.html). Some questions were raised about how useful the proposed extensions will be. Sergey Yakoushkin provided more background on [how these features are used](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100162.html) in a commercial codebase. As Elena notes, these features don't need to a...

Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain