search for: 1.2e

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Dear list members, I am trying to estimate parameters of the AR(1)-GARCH(1,1) model. I have one additional dummy variable for the AR(1) part. First I wanted to do it using garchFit function (everything would be then estimated in one step) however in the fGarch library I didn't find a way to include an additional variable. That would be the formula but, as said, I think it is impossible to add

Dear R experts, format(12345678, digits = 2) gives [1] "1.2e+07" while format(1234567, digits = 2) gives [1] "1234567" but I'd like the last number to be represented as "1.2e+06" string too. Where am I wrong? Thanks, Timur.

I'd like to save the number 0.0000012 to a file just as it appears, but when I dput(0.0000012, "t.txt"), I got 1.2e-06, NOT 0.0000012. Anybody knows how I can do this? > 0.0000012 [1] 1.2e-06 > as.character(0.0000012) [1] "1.2e-06" > dput(0.0000012, "t.txt") Thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I haven't looked inside to see what is causing this, but there's a big discontinuity in qgamma: curve(qgamma(x, shape=19), from=1e-10, to=2e-10) This appears in both R-patched and R-devel. Duncan Murdoch

In the documentation of 'pairs'(package:graphics), within the last example, it reads: format(c(r, 0.123456789), digits=3)[1] Why not simple use: format(r, digits=3)? What is the difference? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/a-quick-question-about-%22format%28%29%22-tf4476762.html#a12764903 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi all, I am running R version 2.4.0 (2006-10-03) on an i686 pc with Mandrake 10.2 Linux. I was given a binary data file containing single precision numbers that I would like to read into R. In a previous posting, someone suggested reading in such data as double(), which is what I've tried: > zz <- file(file, "rb") > h1 <- readBin(con = zz, what = double(), n = 1, size

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CEBA-2005:428 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-428.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1.2E.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bonobo-activation-devel-2.2.2-1.2E.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1.2E.s390x.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:428 bonobo-activation bug fix update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-428.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1.2E.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1.2E.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:428 bonobo-activation bug fix update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-428.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1.2E.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bonobo-activation-devel-2.2.2-1.2E.i386.rpm source:

PROBLEM `signif' does change to scientic notation at different levels depending on the number of significant digits in the input. This can generate tables where figures change ``irregularly'' from normal to scientific notation. PROPOSAL The change to the scientific notation should be made only if the figure in scientific notation - with potentially as

Hello, I have written the function I would like to integrate in two ways: denfxn <- function(yy,vv,a2,b2,mu2) { pp <- 1-pnorm(yy/sqrt(vv)) part1 <- pp^(a2-1) part2 <- (1-pp)^(b2-1) part3 <- dnorm(yy,mu2,sqrt(vv)) return(part1*part2*part3) } denfxnorg <- function(yy,vv,a2,b2,mu2) { pp <- 1-pnorm(yy/sqrt(vv)) pp <- if (pp < .001) .001 else

Hello everyone I appologize for my lack of experience in statistical methods. I am an R user begginer and I am running a logit model using "zelig" and "pcse" packages. I will go to the point and is that Im having problems with interpreting the results of my models.. It is really simple (I guess for the most advanced scholars) however I really dont understand how to interpret

Hello there, I have successfully run Warcraft3-ROC (patch level 1.2e) with wine-0.9.24. Everything works fine (copy protection, sound, ...), but wine refuses to launch the game in another resolution but 800x600x16bpp either in fullcreen or windowed mode. My config : - 1680x1050 TFT display, - geForce 6100 with 128M of videoRAM, and latest Nvidia drivers (1-9629) - a sempron 2800+ I would expect

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CEBA-2005:428 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-428.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1.2E.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bonobo-activation-devel-2.2.2-1.2E.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi@iki.fi -

Hi every one. I have a exponential function (3 fitting parameters) that I would like to use to produce data (6 series) without having to use a loop. Here wl = seq(300,500,1) k1 = c(1.2e-6, 4.9e-6, 9.6e-6, 2.7e-10, 6.7e-8, 7.44e-6) k2 = c(726, 352, 128, 5232, 1538, 128) k3 = c(-176, -224, -257, 88.7, -111, -256) stations = c('R5d', 'R5a', 'R9', '108',

---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Different results from survreg with version 2.6.1 and 2.10.1 From: nathalcs at ulrik.uio.no Date: Fri, March 19, 2010 16:00 To: r-help at r-project.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear all I'm using survreg command in package survival.

I am using 'igraph' package to make some graphs of 'gene-gene interaction'. I can get a data.frame which has three columns. gene1 gene2 pvalue AGT MLR 1.2e-04 MLR 11BHSD1 1.71e-05 IFG2 11BHSD2 2.2e-07 . . . . . . . . . AGTR1 NPPA

Hello, I'm working on bindings for the API (for zig), and was wondering if the R's C API guarantees it won't return null pointers? The only reference I found in the "Writing R Extensions" manual where this not the case is `R_tryEval` and `R_tryEvalSilent`. Otherwise it's unclear. The reason I care about this is syntax. Because I don't know whether SEXPs are NULL or

The following fit does not make sense to me, please, correct me if I have a logical error. > moddowsn Call: coxph(formula = Surv(start, stop, resp) ~ sn + matfac2, data = coxsn1, method = "efron") coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p sn2 0.0497 1.051 0.02030 2.450 1.4e-02 sn3 -0.0532 0.948 0.02038 -2.610 9.0e-03 sn4 -0.0410 0.960