search for: 1.289

Hello, I’m trying to follow the syntax of a script from a journal website. In order to create a regression formula used later in the script, the regression matrix must have column names “X1”, “X2”, etc. I have tried to assign these column names to my matrix ScoutRSM.mat using a for loop, but I don’t know how to interpret the error message. Suggestions? Thanks, Paul

Hello all! I have a problem to extract values greater that for example 1820. I try this code: x[x[,1]>1820,]->x1 Please help me! Thank you! The data structure is: structure(c(2.576, 1.728, 3.434, 2.187, 1.928, 1.886, 1.2425, 1.23, 1.075, 1.1785, 1.186, 1.165, 1.732, 1.517, 1.4095, 1.074, 1.618, 1.677, 1.845, 1.594, 1.6655, 1.1605, 1.425, 1.099, 1.007, 1.1795, 1.3855, 1.4065, 1.138, 1.514,

Hello all! I have a problem with R. I try to merge data like this: structure(c(2.1785, 1.868, 2.1855, 2.5175, 2.025, 2.435, 1.809, 1.628, 1.327, 1.3485, 1.4335, 2.052, 2.2465, 2.151, 1.7945, 1.79, 1.6055, 1.616, 1.633, 1.665, 2.002, 2.152, 1.736, 1.7985, 1.9155, 1.7135, 1.548, 1.568, 1.713, 2.079, 1.875, 2.12, 2.072, 1.906, 1.4645, 1.3025, 1.407, 1.5445, 1.437, 1.463, 1.5235, 1.609, 1.738, 1.478,

I tried to compare if cch() and coxph() can generate same result for same case cohort data Use the standard data in cch(): nwtco Since in cch contains the cohort size=4028, while ccoh.data size =1154 after selection, but coxph does not contain info of cohort size=4028. The rough estimate between coxph() and cch() is same, but the lower and upper CI and P-value are a little different. Can we

I am doing a reanalysis of results that have previously been published. My hope was to demonstrate the value of adoption of more modern regression methods in preference to the traditional approach of univariate stratification. I have encountered a puzzle regarding differences between I thought would be two equivalent analyses. Using a single factor, I compare poisson models with and without

Hello All, I have posted to this list before regarding the same issue so I apologize for the multiple e-mails. I am still struggling with this issue so I thought I'd give it another try. This time I have included reproducible code and a subset of the data I am analyzing. I am running an ANOVA with three factors: GROUP (5 levels), FEATURE (2 levels), and PATIENT (2 levels), where

Dear All, I'm not sure of the interpretation of interactions with contrasts. Can anyone help? I do an ANCOVA, dryweight is covariate, block and treatment are factors, c4 the response variable. model<-aov(log(c4+1)~dryweight+treatment+block+treatment:block) summary(model); Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) dryweight 1 3.947 3.947 6.6268 0.01076 *

The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this...