search for: 1.2200

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "1.2200".

Did you mean: 0.2200
2006 Nov 08
0
[FC5] How to update kernel/kernel-develop for Athlon?
Hello I'm following instructions on how to install Asterisk on Fedora 5, but I'm having a problem: - the host is an older "i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux" - /etc/rpm/platform says athlon-redhat-linux - running "yum update kernel" downloaded "kernel i686 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5" - running "yum update kernel-devel" wants to download "kernel-devel i586
2006 Nov 13
1
Install CentOS on PS3
Hi All, Anyone here going to try running CentOS 4 on a PS3? Is there even a PPC version of CentOS 4 available? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 i686 GNU/Linux 18:03:48 up 3 days, 20:20, 1 user, load average: 1.68, 1.08, 0.86
2006 Oct 18
0
mapping SID - UID, GID with SFU 3.5
I have: linux 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 samba-3.0.23c-1.fc5 W2000 AD with SFU 3.5 uid and gid in SFU linux configured to use AD with ldap client for mapping users, groups and authentication winbind not configured Everyting works fine except ACL in the linux filesystem: I receive this error when I want to add an user access to a file: [2006/10/18 09:38:28, 0]
2007 Feb 20
2
Convert plugin
convert_mail = mbox:%h/mail Convert plugin. If set, specifies the source storage path which is converted to destination storage (mail_location) when the user logs in. The existing mail directory is renamed to <dir>-converted. I'm not entirely clear on what this does. If someone can clarify for me, I'll update the Wiki. I'm hoping it'll allow me to convert
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] recent crashes? Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2239.fc5 (Linux Fedora Core 5)
At the risk of angering the crash Gods, my sustem has NOT crashed again since I downgraded the kernel from 2.6.18-1.2239.fc5 to 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5. Given that newfound stability, and my lack of time, I'm going to put on hold any further diagnostics, until the next kernel revision is released. I have submitted a report at bugzilla.redhat.com (bug 218128). (Ah, nuts; accidentally created a
2006 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
Tanya, Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't that be llvm-1.9? * LLVM was built in Release mode in all cases * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4 binary seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs. *
2006 Nov 16
5
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
First, thanks for testing this! > Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) > > HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS > * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't > that be llvm-1.9? We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build llvm it will know its version 1.9. > * LLVM was built in Release mode
2006 Nov 14
5
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
LLVMers, The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/ If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd also appreciate any documentation reviews. Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You should see one XPASS for
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
Hello; I was able to build and install llvm(3.0) under Ubuntu 11.10 (using the ./configure script found under llvm source, and then make and make install). While configuring, I gave --prefix as a directory where I would like llvm to be installed. I did not give --with-llvmgccdir and the --enable-optimized argument to configure. Because 3.0 doesn't come with llvmgcc source/binaries and I
2006 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing (TAKE TWO)
Hi Tanya, Here's my second attempt on Fedora Core 5. The changes this time are: 1. Using GCC 4.0.3 as the compiler 2. Building everything from source (no pre-built binaries used) BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues, just the usual warnings. BUILD LLVM-GCC WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues RUN LLVM-TEST WITH GCC 4.0.3 * The following failures were encountered. Some of them are
2013 Mar 12
5
extract values
Hello all! I have a problem to extract values greater that for example 1820. I try this code: x[x[,1]>1820,]->x1 Please help me! Thank you! The data structure is: structure(c(2.576, 1.728, 3.434, 2.187, 1.928, 1.886, 1.2425, 1.23, 1.075, 1.1785, 1.186, 1.165, 1.732, 1.517, 1.4095, 1.074, 1.618, 1.677, 1.845, 1.594, 1.6655, 1.1605, 1.425, 1.099, 1.007, 1.1795, 1.3855, 1.4065, 1.138, 1.514,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make