search for: 1.1gb

Hi all, I am Running Apache as frontend server to mongrel and uploaded 1.1 Gb of file using my rails application .Now I am trying to download same 1.1 GB stream ,for that i loaded mod_xsendfile.so in apache httpd.conf file and using send_file function downloaded this 1.1 gb of stream successfully.but after downloading it ,again am trying to download same 1.1 gb of stream but now am getting failed

Hello, i have a problem with a very huge mail account. The INBOX of this account has ~1.1 - ~1.7 million mails inside. And from time to time the index cache make problems and i got the following in the logs: --- Snip --- Jan 10 20:43:04 XXXXX dovecot: imap(XXXXX): Panic: file mail-index-util.c: line 37 (mail_index_uint32_to_offset): assertion failed: (offset < 0x40000000) --- Snap --- I

Hello again, After some time, I succeeded in splitting "flush" and "restart" functions. A quick measurement gives me ~25% speed improvement, which is quite a lot. Of course this optimization is specific for this use case (many short signals). Is this interesting for the project? I would gladly contribute it... If yes, how should I share it? As a patch against current git?

Hi, I have a very odd issue - I cannot copy a large-ish (1.1GB) ISO file to a Samba share on a specific server, and having spent a couple of days on the issue, I'm running out of things to try, and I'm hoping for some suggestions. The destination system is an old P4 system on a Via based motherboard (P4MA Pro). It has two IDE disks, a Maxtor 40GB on IDE channel 1 as the system disk,

Hello All, I have a very large data set (1.1GB) that I am trying to read into R. The file is tab delimited and contains headers; there are over 800 columns and almost 700,000 rows. I am using the Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon version of R. I am using Kernel Linux 2.6.22-14-generic. I have 3.1GB of RAM with the AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+. I downloaded R using the instructions from cran under

Thanks Dean and Bruce. 1.1GB is a "lot" smaller than I expected, my worry was that it might be >60GB with the entire change histories to v1.0. Disk space is not a problem (at ~€80 per TB) just ISP download caps and 1.1GB is well under the radar :-) I will get Phabricator set up for collaboration. Thanks again for your help, MartinO -----Original Message----- From: Dean Michael

hi. 1. I tried to encode some wav files with a size of 700MB - 1.1GB and got the message: "ERROR: no data sub-chunk". I used flac version 0.8 and 0.9. 2. It would be nice if flac displays the filename of the current used file. the reason: I started flac with a command like this: "flac -d 1.flac 1.wav; flac -d 2.flac 2.wav; flac -d 3.flac 3.wav; flac -d 4.flac 4.wav; flac -d

Hi, Small question: I have removed 177000 deleted objects from our DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=...ldb, effectively reducing it's filesize from 1.1GB to 6.3MB. Now I would like to replace the big .ldb with the small .ldb.backup Is it safe to do: - service sernet-samba-ad stop - tdbbackup DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=...ldb -s .backup - mv DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=...ldb DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=...deleted - cp

Hi, since the Tails ISO grew from ~900MB to ~1.1GB, we see this warning when running isohybrid on it: isohybrid: Warning: more than 1024 cylinders: 1045 isohybrid: Not all BIOSes will be able to boot this device I guess that's fully expected. And, as expected, we get boot failure reports from users. So, my question is: is there a "known optimal" combination of isohybrid

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:48 PM Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I recommend using https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507 if you can spare 1.1 GB of disk and bandwidth for the initial checkout and git repo itself. > It's just a few minutes behind the svn master copies. I don't know of a better monorepo at present. > Although

If I run the following command: # /usr/local/bin/rsync -a --stats -v --delete --force --recursive /source /dest building file list ... done source/file1 source/file2 source/file3 source/file4 source/file5 source/ Number of files: 74 Number of files transferred: 5 Total file size: 1104726340 bytes Total transferred file size: 115163136 bytes Literal data: 463500 bytes Matched data: 114699636

Dear Developers: I have a question about memory management in R 2.2.1 and am wondering if you would be kind enough to help me understand what is going on. (It has been a few years since I have done software development on Windows, so I apologize in advance if these are easy questions.) ------------- MY SYSTEM ------------- I am currently using R (version 2.2.1) on a PC running Windows 2000

I have been using rsync to sync a SQL database dump(127GB in size) on a server (cygwin to linux) for many years now w/o a problem, until they put a maintence plan to reindex the database once a week. This is all done over a 2Mbit link normally took 3-4 hrs now I noticed it was running the next day and took days so I looked into it more. After I discovered the --only-write-batch it makes a 52 GB

Hi folks, I am currently evaluating Dovecot for deployment to ~200 software engineers (so, heavy email users); I'm hoping this list could provide wisdom about how best to do the configuration, evaluation and deployment, and what testing folks have done to determine whether dovecot is right for their site. Below I've listed the diffs between the dovecot-example.conf and our config.

Dear, New Xenoppix is released. http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/xen/index-en.html It has new fueature (Xenoppix-terminal-server and install2win). It bases on KNOPPIX 4.0.2 DVD or CD. (The size of Xenoppix is sitll over 700MB, please burn a DVD-ROM.) New feature (Experimental) *Act as a terminal server. Xenoppix can be a Terminal Server and boots clinet PC with PXE network

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

Greetings, I was on IRC about 7 hours ago and suggested that the FAQ be updated slightly. Rather than sit on my ass and complain I figured I'd ask a few people, and see if the idea was worth the time. Here's what Ive started with: http://www.dimension.net.nz/theora.html I'll be adding to it over the next 24 hours - mostly in the area of Playback and Encoding. Just threw it together

Yes, it's not bad. You can actually reduce the size of the .git directory to 597 MB by running "git repack -a -d -f --depth=250 --window=250". This takes less than 5 minutes on a 16 core Xeon. Unfortunately I've never found a way to get such a nicely packed repo into github such that it checks out for others as nicely as it was when I uploaded it :-( On Mon, May 14, 2018 at

Dear List I need to transform a large matrix M with many NAs into a list L with one row for each non missing cell. Every row should contain the cell value in the first column, and its coordinates of the matrix in column 2 and 3. M: x1 x2 y1 1 2 y2 4 5 y3 7 8 L: v x y 1 1 1 4 1 2 7 1 2 2 2 1 5 2 2 8 2 3 I'm trying to do this with a loop, but since my matrix is quite large (around