Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "1.12771".
2016 Mar 08
4
llvm and clang are getting slower
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Rafael Espíndola
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > I have just benchmarked building trunk llvm and clang in Debug,
> > Release and LTO modes (see the attached scrip for the cmake lines).
> >
> > The compilers used were
2016 Mar 09
2
llvm and clang are getting slower
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Rafael Espíndola
>>
2016 Mar 08
9
llvm and clang are getting slower
I have just benchmarked building trunk llvm and clang in Debug,
Release and LTO modes (see the attached scrip for the cmake lines).
The compilers used were clang 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 and trunk. In all
cases I used the system libgcc and libstdc++.
For release builds there is a monotonic increase in each version. From
163 minutes with 3.5 to 212 minutes with trunk. For comparison, gcc
5.3.2 takes