search for: 1.0001x

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "1.0001x".

Did you mean: 1.0011x
2010 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] MmapAllocator
Hi Steven- Nice, but will this not break Windows? From an initial glance over your patch, it seems to assume the existence of mmap() in some form or other. Alistair On 8 Aug 2010, at 03:05, Steven Noonan wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've been doing work on memory reduction in Unladen Swallow, and > during testing, LiveRanges seemed to be consuming one of the largest > chunks of
2010 Aug 08
4
[LLVMdev] MmapAllocator
Hi folks, I've been doing work on memory reduction in Unladen Swallow, and during testing, LiveRanges seemed to be consuming one of the largest chunks of memory. I wrote a replacement allocator for use by BumpPtrAllocator which uses mmap()/munmap() in place of malloc()/free(). It has worked flawlessly in testing, and reduces memory usage quite nicely in Unladen Swallow. The code is available