search for: 0xx

...--challenge=%{%{mschap:Challenge}:-00} \ --nt-response=%{%{mschap:NT-Response}:-00}" In the end all tests result in : (4) MS-CHAP-Error = "\000E=691 R=1 C=877c690dc4020be0 V=2" Testing with : ntlm_auth --allow-mschapv2 --username=myusername --challenge=0x.... --nt-response=0xx... Returns : The attempted logon is invalid. This is either due to a bad username or authentication information. (0xc000006d) So if someone has an idea whats going on/where to look? Its most probely something simple what i not seeing.. I did add freerad user to winbindd_priv group also. I als...

...keep the bindings working in the future and to prevent it from being degraded when someone adds new features to the bindings or APIs. In libguestfs, when you add a new binding, it is preferred to add the same tests as the ones implemented in OCaml or Perl bindings. This means that I will implement 0XX tests defined in tests of OCaml or Perl bindings. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am planning to send the patch 3 times: after implementing the generator of Actions(APIs) and Structs, after implementing the events and miscellaneous, after completi...

...> --nt-response=%{%{mschap:NT-Response}:-00}" > > In the end all tests result in : > > (4) MS-CHAP-Error = "\000E=691 R=1 C=877c690dc4020be0 V=2" > > Testing with : > ntlm_auth --allow-mschapv2 --username=myusername --challenge=0x.... --nt-response=0xx... > Returns : The attempted logon is invalid. This is either due to a bad username or authentication information. (0xc000006d) > > So if someone has an idea whats going on/where to look? > Its most probely something simple what i not seeing.. > > I did add freerad user to w...

is the hint 99,hint,ZAP/1 supposed to work or how do I get the lights on the phones to display channels in use in addition to extensions in use?

...se}:-00}" > > > > In the end all tests result in : > > > > (4) MS-CHAP-Error = "\000E=691 R=1 C=877c690dc4020be0 V=2" > > > > Testing with : > > ntlm_auth --allow-mschapv2 --username=myusername > --challenge=0x.... --nt-response=0xx... > > Returns : The attempted logon is invalid. This is either > due to a bad username or authentication information. (0xc000006d) > > > > So if someone has an idea whats going on/where to look? > > Its most probely something simple what i not seeing.. > > &...

...?y???HN2??i?r?J?{???????\>?HtY|x?R???"96dV:??v??/V?[% ???????????????#?!2?!??????2L???f?1???w?A??0??fuM???{L?%J??? Q????p6<? ?Y??a?IXu]hHe?x????? \d1u??x??????? ?8?I????K?atX?q??????? ?h?/?~3HI????,\ ^?h|\l<g????w/??? ??R???&???????v>?1J?H$?,K?> ?M????ld"/:$j?W????:6v?? 0xX j????$? -???>l7i?J?g????,??q} x?l?H?-??U ??I?G<5????P????x?,pW?a ?????<?4d???8~r??7?????(?&??. ???m?:?????]Pq?x?? ???Q????? ???-~&??_:?}??YG?e???9?8?'??Z~????b.????Q?????CaL.???????n??ZnB?g?fu'?? ?)???Gr8iW?? ?E?`hQ|?%LZ?????k#???)o??:???&??O? ]?*?? P?n?????m?P???(s?-...

The thing I dislike the most about the 79xx phones is that in DHCP mode, they expect the DHCP server to tell them their TFTP server address. They won't let you set it manually. So if I don't have DHCP server that gives TFTP server info, which is most of the DHCP servers at out there, then the phone won't be able to download any updates made to the SIP000*.cnf file. Using dhcpd on

...t;> >>> In the end all tests result in : >>> >>> (4) MS-CHAP-Error = "\000E=691 R=1 C=877c690dc4020be0 V=2" >>> >>> Testing with : >>> ntlm_auth --allow-mschapv2 --username=myusername >> --challenge=0x.... --nt-response=0xx... >>> Returns : The attempted logon is invalid. This is either >> due to a bad username or authentication information. (0xc000006d) >>> >>> So if someone has an idea whats going on/where to look? >>> Its most probely something simple what i not seeing....

HI, I am trying to install xen through yum. Here is what I did. [root@localhost Kishore]# yum install kernel-xen xen Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.31.9-174.fc12 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31.9-174.fc12 for package: kernel-2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

...qr#q at P)2;8GFcQ=TG6W&sv2} z_HJ0-!HbJTMrL9tRHi;8G_qXg<OCccQfPq}chGmfgvqjxonA?uFUGF=vS0s+JlgAF zDveo;#jhu8n26PnvKE|$SBMX(*tC*#RMUz%0(Pytzs|Eaukcfav<gCN-3_^E*Sr}3 zV7ySMH0UCF#a28z)mhB}IU9KvS1$2w1X$Sup6_psIu7gwr*Y1f&)Bsf-`XMT6xb<y zAe-Q3Mf6GeXV=12N%-D=SQlc at 875vB)X!k3mg`q8^-j#Ei<0XX6J2zB$pZ$fglw4x z)~*VCX)yMqq~<Yu=0rMPIWBirLgMVxk<Ehdi?Xy_uW}X-_9j*DlPFO;1;0v5Iym at 9 zmDAaA!q<0vG^tJ<^6p0-4Wm(ZXEFolXOg~pzK_0jO_Q{3d&a(ZFOcoI8dd>#PPTlC zKl4*;vsI?eH|`~=$ZuXmp|P~9{MNJA2BgB2c}~ruD9cre%khTyOaYJeW6ewe(?twL z5v?^iiaQ}A<@2)0zKa$2Fm$?w;ZJ`@cS6`SoklU>&<7`Z!r...