search for: 0xee

dear redhat, i examined a friend's system today, to help him configure it. assuming that he just "installed" from scratch the samba package, it appears that you have provided a default smb.conf file for redhat 6.1 that puts samba private configuration files in /etc. the suggested options, for example show "smbpasswd file = /etc/smbpasswd". this is REALLY bad. 1) you

Previous 2.6.31-rc8 kernel was built on F11 and installed with modules on F12. Current kernel has been built on F12 (2.6.31-0.204.rc9.fc12.x86_64) and installed on F12 before loading under Xen 3.4.1. Dmesg log looks similar to Michael Yuong''s ''rc7.git4''  kernel for F12. Boris. --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Boris

...rc/pygrub Tue Apr 10 20:30:05 2007 +0900 @@ -58,6 +60,13 @@ def get_active_partition(file): # active partition has 0x80 as the first byte if struct.unpack("<c", buf[poff:poff+1]) == (''\x80'',): return buf[poff:poff+16] + + # type=0xee: GUID partition table + # XXX assume the first partition is active + if struct.unpack("<c", buf[poff+4:poff+5]) == (''\xee'',): + os.lseek(fd, 0x400, 0) + buf = os.read(fd, 512) + return buf[24:40] # XXX buf[32:40] #...

...sbin/smbd [0x82082d6] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x820bfb3] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x820c3fa] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd(pdb_getsampwsid+0x7d) [0x81ec69d] #12 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81ec7ca] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81eccb0] #14 /usr/sbin/smbd(pdb_sid_to_id+0x29) [0x81eb079] #15 /usr/sbin/smbd(sid_to_gid+0xee) [0x81eecae] #16 /usr/sbin/smbd(pdb_set_group_sid+0x4d) [0x81e55cd] #17 /usr/sbin/smbd(pdb_set_group_sid_from_rid+0x67) [0x81ee287] #18 /usr/sbin/smbd(init_sam_from_buffer_v3+0x8f1) [0x81e7ed1] #19 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x82082d6] #20 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x820bfb3] #21 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x820...

...48 to 55) of its GPT entry: "Legacy BIOS Bootable". That's the main goal of gptmbr.bin: to be able to boot a GPT scheme in _BIOS_ mode. > So indeed, EFI on hard disk does not need more of an MBR than the magic > number at bytes 510, 511 and an MBR partition entry of type 0xEE or > 0xEF. Well, for booting in UEFI mode, the (0xEE and/or 0xEF and/or any other) "legacy" partition(s) in the so-called "msdos partition table scheme" (aka "protective MBR partition table) in the first sector is/are not really essential but rather a UEFI "f...

...000001 00000000 0x0034f558: 00000003 00000001 00000000 00000003 Backtrace: =>1 0x0041654d in compa (+0x1654d) (0x0034f620) 2 0x0041082f in compa (+0x1082f) (0x0034fc60) 3 0x004187e8 in compa (+0x187e8) (0x0034fec8) 4 0x0043a224 in compa (+0x3a224) (0x0034ff08) 5 0x7b87547e start_process+0xee(arg=0x0) [/build/buildd/wine-0.9.46/dlls/kernel32/process.c:839] in kernel32 (0x0034ffe8) 6 0xf7de2a17 wine_switch_to_stack+0x17() in libwine.so.1 (0x00000000) 0x0041654d: fldl 0xffffff80(%ecx,%eax,8) Modules: Module Address Debug info Name (16 modules) PE 4000...

...e1, 0xe2, 0xe4 }, { 0xe1, 0xe2, 0xe3, 0xe5 }, { 0xe2, 0xe3, 0xe4, 0xe6 }, { 0xe3, 0xe4, 0xe5, 0xe7 }, { 0xe4, 0xe5, 0xe6, 0xe8 }, { 0xe5, 0xe6, 0xe7, 0xe9 }, { 0xe6, 0xe7, 0xe8, 0xea }, { 0xe7, 0xe8, 0xe9, 0xeb }, { 0xe8, 0xe9, 0xea, 0xec }, { 0xe9, 0xea, 0xeb, 0xed }, { 0xea, 0xeb, 0xec, 0xee }, { 0xeb, 0xec, 0xed, 0xef }, { 0xec, 0xed, 0xee, 0xf0 }, { 0xed, 0xee, 0xef, 0xf1 }, { 0xee, 0xef, 0xf0, 0xf2 }, { 0xef, 0xf0, 0xf1, 0xf3 }, { 0xf0, 0xf1, 0xf2, 0xf4 }, { 0xf1, 0xf2, 0xf3, 0xf5 }, { 0xf2, 0xf3, 0xf4, 0xf6 }, { 0xf3, 0xf4, 0xf5, 0xf7 }, { 0xf4, 0xf5, 0xf6, 0xf8 }, { 0xf...

...00fcf100, caf=00000000, taf=0000000000000000 (XEN) Xen call trace: (XEN) [<ffff83000010f240>] get_page+0x107/0x1b4 (XEN) [<ffff83000010f10a>] get_page_and_type+0x21/0x50 (XEN) [<ffff8300001116c4>] __gnttab_copy+0x3f5/0x5b4 (XEN) [<ffff830000111971>] gnttab_copy+0xee/0x1c4 (XEN) [<ffff830000111dbd>] do_grant_table_op+0x376/0x3bc (XEN) [<ffff8300001b83e2>] syscall_enter+0xa2/0xfc (XEN) (XEN) Guest stack trace from rbp=ffff830000ff3cf8: (XEN) ???????????????? <G><2>grant_table.c:990:d0 do_grant_table_op: domain 0, cmd 5, count 1 (...

...br[12], &tmp, sizeof(tmp)); + } mbr += 16; } mbr[0] = 0x55; @@ -908,8 +954,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) if (!read_efi_section(buf)) { buf += 32; if (!read_efi_catalogue(buf, &efi_count, &efi_lba) && efi_lba) { - offset = 1; - type = 0xee; + offset = 0; } else { errx(1, "%s: invalid efi catalogue", argv[0]); } @@ -925,8 +970,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) if (!read_efi_section(buf)) { buf += 32; if (!read_efi_catalogue(buf, &mac_count, &mac_lba) && mac_lba) { - offset = 1;...

...e1, 0xe2, 0xe4 }, { 0xe1, 0xe2, 0xe3, 0xe5 }, { 0xe2, 0xe3, 0xe4, 0xe6 }, { 0xe3, 0xe4, 0xe5, 0xe7 }, { 0xe4, 0xe5, 0xe6, 0xe8 }, { 0xe5, 0xe6, 0xe7, 0xe9 }, { 0xe6, 0xe7, 0xe8, 0xea }, { 0xe7, 0xe8, 0xe9, 0xeb }, { 0xe8, 0xe9, 0xea, 0xec }, { 0xe9, 0xea, 0xeb, 0xed }, { 0xea, 0xeb, 0xec, 0xee }, { 0xeb, 0xec, 0xed, 0xef }, { 0xec, 0xed, 0xee, 0xf0 }, { 0xed, 0xee, 0xef, 0xf1 }, { 0xee, 0xef, 0xf0, 0xf2 }, { 0xef, 0xf0, 0xf1, 0xf3 }, { 0xf0, 0xf1, 0xf2, 0xf4 }, { 0xf1, 0xf2, 0xf3, 0xf5 }, { 0xf2, 0xf3, 0xf4, 0xf6 }, { 0xf3, 0xf4, 0xf5, 0xf7 }, { 0xf4, 0xf5, 0xf6, 0xf8 }, { 0xf...

...lly at a loss. I had 5.11 running on this machine, from this physical boot disk, until I stepped on /bin the other day. I've tried installing Centos 5.10 and 5.11 to this Seagate 1TB drive. Both installs run perfectly, but when I try to reboot, grub says Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0xee googling this indicates that the disk has a GUID partition table. This must have been done by the installer??? If so, why doesn't it get the boot loader set up correctly? Sigh, So stage two of the saga, I thought I would try to install CentOS 6.5 (I had the dvds burned already). It boots, bu...

> There's 0 need to build MBRs for > EFI At least gptmbr.bin might come to mind (after all, GPT is part of the UEFI specs). Isohybrid with UEFI options perhaps too? > and I'm looking at why utils/ depends on mbr/ isohybrid(.pl) and mkdiskimage come to mind here? I'm not saying for certain these are the reasons for such dependencies, but they might (and perhaps

...m this physical boot disk, until I > > stepped on /bin the other day. > > > > I've tried installing Centos 5.10 and 5.11 to this Seagate 1TB drive. > Both > > installs run perfectly, but when I try to reboot, grub says > > Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0xee > > > > googling this indicates that the disk has a GUID partition table. This > > must have been done by the installer??? If so, why doesn't it get the > boot loader > > set up correctly? > <snip> > As it's only a 1TB drive, what does fdisk say? Or pa...

...estions remain: _ Is the original desire *not* to use "EE" still relevant? _ If no particular "matched" ID is used in gptmbr.bin, should "ED" still be used? I wonder whether it would be better to change it (back) to "EE" (?). FWIW, UEFI 2.4 says: [quote] 0xEE (i.e., GPT Protective) is used by a protective MBR (see 5.2.2) to define a fake partition covering the entire disk. [/quote] Regards, Ady.

...[/build/buildd/wine1.3-1.4/dlls/ntdll/sync.c:1122] in ntdll (0x0043e808) 4 0x7bc79f6b NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0x5a(count=0x2, handles=0x43e868, wait_all=0, alertable=1, timeout=(nil)) [/build/buildd/wine1.3-1.4/dlls/ntdll/sync.c:1160] in ntdll (0x0043e838) 5 0x7b86c77f WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0xee(count=0x2, handles=0x111848, wait_all=0, timeout=0xffffffff, alertable=0x1) [/build/buildd/wine1.3-1.4/dlls/kernel32/sync.c:188] in kernel32 (0x0043e988) 6 0x7ec1cb3c rpcrt4_protseq_np_wait_for_new_connection+0x4b(protseq=0x111860, count=0x2, wait_array=0x111848) [/build/buildd/wine1.3-1.4/dlls/r...

...0032eea8 00000000 b7d95ff4 0x0032ee20: 0000005c 7cbd9d60 00000068 b7ca5e3f 0x0032ee30: 0032ee6c 7cbd9d68 7cbd9d68 b7c7683b 0x0032ee40: b7d95ff4 0000005c 7cbd9d68 0032ef18 Backtrace: =>0 0xb7f1e430 (0x0032ee08) 1 0xb7c64098 abort+0x188() in libc.so.6 (0x0032ef30) 2 0xb7c5b5ce __assert_fail+0xee() in libc.so.6 (0x0032ef74) 3 0x7db04201 in psb_dri.so (+0x27201) (0x0032f054) 4 0x7db03f1c in psb_dri.so (+0x26f1c) (0x0032f094) 5 0x7db2e9e0 in psb_dri.so (+0x519e0) (0x0032f0c4) 6 0x7db250ee in psb_dri.so (+0x480ee) (0x0032f114) 7 0x7dc4d9b9 _mesa_Clear+0x1f7() in psb_dri.so (0x0032f14...

...map(maildir_storage_sync_init+0x63) [0x4227b3] -> imap(imap_sync_nonselected+0xf) [0x41be9f] -> imap(_cmd_select_full+0xc5) [0x413f95] -> imap(cmd_select+0xb) [0x41411b] -> imap [0x415a87] -> imap [0x415b2c] -> imap(_client_input+0x75) [0x415cd5] -> imap(io_loop_handler_run+0xee) [0x4684ce] -> imap(io_loop_run+0x2d) [0x46797d] -> imap(main+0x3e3) [0x41d7b3] -> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdb) [0x2aaaaace049b] -> imap [0x410cca] When this happens, my users just get timeouts trying to do stuff. I have my messages (maildirs) and indices all stored on NF...

...7:21.179702 <sambaserver>.ifs.domain > <w2kmachine>.ifs.1700: 25834 NXDomain* 0/1/0 (105) (DF) 14:27:21.180559 <w2kmachine>.ifs.netbios-dgm > <sambaserver>.ifs.netbios-dgm: >>> NBT UDP PACKET(138) Res=0x110E ID=0x81A9 IP=10 (0xa).21 (0x15).32 (0x20).238 (0xee) Port=138 (0x8a) Length=229 (0xe5) Res2= 0x0 SourceName=<w2kmachine> NameType=0x00 (Workstation) DestName=IFS NameType=0x1C (Unknown) SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST) 14:27:26.180442 <w2kmachine>.ifs.netbios-dgm > <sambaserver>.ifs.netbios-dgm: &...

...0032c1a8 00000000 b7f02ff4 0x0032c120: 0000004f 7c311258 00000068 b7e17cff 0x0032c130: 0032c16c 7c311260 7c311260 b7de89cb 0x0032c140: b7f02ff4 0000004f 7c311260 0032c218 Backtrace: =>0 0xb8088430 (0x0032c108) 1 0xb7dd6268 abort+0x188() in libc.so.6 (0x0032c230) 2 0xb7dcd72e __assert_fail+0xee() in libc.so.6 (0x0032c274) 3 0x7d1da87c in i915_dri.so (+0x3f87c) (0x0032c294) 4 0x7d2af1d0 _mesa_BindProgram+0xf0() in i915_dri.so (0x0032c2c4) 5 0x7d46ba03 in wined3d (+0xba03) (0x0032c474) 6 0x7d4829c0 ActivateContext+0x3b0() in wined3d (0x0032c774) 7 0x7d4ba42d drawPrimitive+0xcd() i...

...a2>] wb_writeback+0x22a/0x358 [ 66.438383] [<00000000002b0cd0>] bdi_writeback_workfn+0x354/0x538 [ 66.438618] [<000000000014e3aa>] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x418 [ 66.438621] [<000000000014ef94>] worker_thread+0x48/0x524 [ 66.438625] [<00000000001560ca>] kthread+0xee/0x108 [ 66.438627] [<000000000067c76e>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc [ 66.438628] [<000000000067c768>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc [ 66.438629] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [ 66.438631] [<00000000003edde8>] blk_mq_timeout_check+0x6c/0xb8 I looked into the dump, and...