search for: 0xcf

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 146 matches for "0xcf".

Did you mean: 0x0f
2011 Feb 11
1
null pointer dereference in iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic while updating rpm packages
...eb 10 10:59:45 testbox kernel: [ 524.496006] [<f8218129>] btrfs_file_aio_write+0x480/0x79b [btrfs] Feb 10 10:59:45 testbox kernel: [ 524.496006] [<c04dd8e4>] ? mem_cgroup_update_page_stat+0x1a/0xd4 Feb 10 10:59:45 testbox kernel: [ 524.496006] [<c04e3e76>] do_sync_write+0x96/0xcf Feb 10 10:59:45 testbox kernel: [ 524.496006] [<c04e4265>] ? rw_verify_area+0xd0/0xf3 Feb 10 10:59:45 testbox kernel: [ 524.496006] [<c04e44fd>] vfs_write+0x8f/0xd7 Feb 10 10:59:45 testbox kernel: [ 524.496006] [<c04e3de0>] ? do_sync_write+0x0/0xcf Feb 10 10:59:45 testbox ke...
2004 Mar 03
2
Windows 2k SP4 Printing causes smbd to dump
...KTRACE: 22 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic+0x14e) [0x819055e] #1 smbd [0x81805c7] #2 smbd [0x42029188] #3 smbd(print_queue_status+0x146) [0x81aa706] #4 smbd(_spoolss_enumjobs+0xef) [0x810c56f] #5 smbd [0x80fdc5c] #6 smbd(api_rpcTNP+0x213) [0x812a333] #7 smbd(api_pipe_request+0xcf) [0x812a08f] #8 smbd [0x8124468] #9 smbd [0x812464f] #10 smbd [0x81248ec] #11 smbd [0x8124ac9] #12 smbd(write_to_pipe+0xe4) [0x8124a44] #13 smbd [0x8088011] #14 smbd(reply_trans+0x995) [0x8088c95] #15 smbd [0x80bc6e9] #16 smbd [0x80bc78e] #17 smbd(process_smb+0x1a7) [0...
2009 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Very slow performance of lli on x86
...c2, 0xc3, 0xc5 }, { 0xc2, 0xc3, 0xc4, 0xc6 }, { 0xc3, 0xc4, 0xc5, 0xc7 }, { 0xc4, 0xc5, 0xc6, 0xc8 }, { 0xc5, 0xc6, 0xc7, 0xc9 }, { 0xc6, 0xc7, 0xc8, 0xca }, { 0xc7, 0xc8, 0xc9, 0xcb }, { 0xc8, 0xc9, 0xca, 0xcc }, { 0xc9, 0xca, 0xcb, 0xcd }, { 0xca, 0xcb, 0xcc, 0xce }, { 0xcb, 0xcc, 0xcd, 0xcf }, { 0xcc, 0xcd, 0xce, 0xd0 }, { 0xcd, 0xce, 0xcf, 0xd1 }, { 0xce, 0xcf, 0xd0, 0xd2 }, { 0xcf, 0xd0, 0xd1, 0xd3 }, { 0xd0, 0xd1, 0xd2, 0xd4 }, { 0xd1, 0xd2, 0xd3, 0xd5 }, { 0xd2, 0xd3, 0xd4, 0xd6 }, { 0xd3, 0xd4, 0xd5, 0xd7 }, { 0xd4, 0xd5, 0xd6, 0xd8 }, { 0xd5, 0xd6, 0xd7, 0xd9 }, { 0xd...
2007 Feb 06
3
Warhammer: Dawn Of War Winter Assault Expansion (MSI problem)
...msi (0x0034f9c8) 5 0x7eb2b530 ui_actionstart+0x50() in msi (0x0034f9e8) 6 0x7eb2d216 ACTION_HandleStandardAction+0xd6() in msi (0x0034fa28) 7 0x7eb2d462 ACTION_PerformAction+0x42() in msi (0x0034fa68) 8 0x7eb2da24 ITERATE_Actions+0x1b4() in msi (0x0034fa98) 9 0x7eb5f6af MSI_IterateRecords+0xcf() in msi (0x0034fad8) 10 0x7eb2b771 ACTION_ProcessExecSequence+0x101() in msi (0x0034fb18) 11 0x7eb2d230 ACTION_HandleStandardAction+0xf0() in msi (0x0034fb58) 12 0x7eb2d763 ACTION_PerformUIAction+0x43() in msi (0x0034fb98) 13 0x7eb2d931 ITERATE_Actions+0xc1() in msi (0x0034fbc8) 14 0x7eb...
2009 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Very slow performance of lli on x86
...c2, 0xc3, 0xc5 }, { 0xc2, 0xc3, 0xc4, 0xc6 }, { 0xc3, 0xc4, 0xc5, 0xc7 }, { 0xc4, 0xc5, 0xc6, 0xc8 }, { 0xc5, 0xc6, 0xc7, 0xc9 }, { 0xc6, 0xc7, 0xc8, 0xca }, { 0xc7, 0xc8, 0xc9, 0xcb }, { 0xc8, 0xc9, 0xca, 0xcc }, { 0xc9, 0xca, 0xcb, 0xcd }, { 0xca, 0xcb, 0xcc, 0xce }, { 0xcb, 0xcc, 0xcd, 0xcf }, { 0xcc, 0xcd, 0xce, 0xd0 }, { 0xcd, 0xce, 0xcf, 0xd1 }, { 0xce, 0xcf, 0xd0, 0xd2 }, { 0xcf, 0xd0, 0xd1, 0xd3 }, { 0xd0, 0xd1, 0xd2, 0xd4 }, { 0xd1, 0xd2, 0xd3, 0xd5 }, { 0xd2, 0xd3, 0xd4, 0xd6 }, { 0xd3, 0xd4, 0xd5, 0xd7 }, { 0xd4, 0xd5, 0xd6, 0xd8 }, { 0xd5, 0xd6, 0xd7, 0xd9 }, { 0xd...
2020 Aug 07
2
[PATCH v3 4/7] x86/paravirt: remove 32-bit support from PARAVIRT_XXL
...0x07 }, // swapgs; sysretq > .cpu_swapgs = { 0x0f, 0x01, 0xf8 }, // swapgs > .mov64 = { 0x48, 0x89, 0xf8 }, // mov %rdi, %rax > -# else > - .mmu_write_cr3 = { 0x0f, 0x22, 0xd8 }, // mov %eax, %cr3 > - .irq_restore_fl = { 0x50, 0x9d }, // push %eax; popf > - .cpu_iret = { 0xcf }, // iret > -# endif I was looking at x86_64 paravirt the other day and found we actually have pv_ops.cpu.iret users there.. So we want to change the above to also patch iret on x86_64 or do we need to fix x86_64 to not have pv-iret?
2020 Aug 07
2
[PATCH v3 4/7] x86/paravirt: remove 32-bit support from PARAVIRT_XXL
...0x07 }, // swapgs; sysretq > .cpu_swapgs = { 0x0f, 0x01, 0xf8 }, // swapgs > .mov64 = { 0x48, 0x89, 0xf8 }, // mov %rdi, %rax > -# else > - .mmu_write_cr3 = { 0x0f, 0x22, 0xd8 }, // mov %eax, %cr3 > - .irq_restore_fl = { 0x50, 0x9d }, // push %eax; popf > - .cpu_iret = { 0xcf }, // iret > -# endif I was looking at x86_64 paravirt the other day and found we actually have pv_ops.cpu.iret users there.. So we want to change the above to also patch iret on x86_64 or do we need to fix x86_64 to not have pv-iret?
2002 Apr 26
0
ext3 assertion failure
...ed c45c5800 c880538b c45c5800 c3a7f640 c8802811 c45c5800 c45c58e4 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c5583aa0 c20a2960 c0b87640 000000f0 c1498ae0 c033ab9c c019f880 Call Trace: [<c88093af>] __insmod_jbd_S.rodata_L96 [jbd] 0x285f [<c88052ff>] log_wait_commit_R6c342301 [jbd] 0xcf [<c880538b>] journal_bmap_Rbbdc8009 [jbd] 0x7b [<c8802811>] journal_flushpage_R40b21025 [jbd] 0xa21 [<c019f880>] do_rw_disk [kernel] 0x150 [<c011317e>] schedule [kernel] 0x26e [<c8804e3b>] journal_revoke_R67623458 [jbd] 0x5eb [<c8804d10>] journal_revoke_R67623458...
2007 Nov 06
1
assertion failed with hg current
...(index_mail_cache_add_idx+0x69) [0x8085629] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x806f776] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(mail_storage_copy+0x53) [0x80ab3b3] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(maildir_copy+0x52) [0x8067802] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(deliver_save+0xcf) [0x80592df] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(main+0x1317) [0x805a7e7] -> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0) [0x948f70] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x8058541] Besides that, it seems to run fine.
2019 Dec 16
2
Tracking down severe regression in 5.3-rc4/5.4 for TU116 - assistance needed
...0007: begin idle timeout ffffffff > kernel: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: tmr: stalled at ffffffffffffffff > kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: timeout > kernel: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 384 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bar/g84.c:35 g84_bar_flush+0xcf/> 0xe0 [nouveau] (detailed log in a corresponding issue - [1]) With earlier kernels there was no hardware acceleration for NVidia GTX 1660 Ti, but at least I could use nouveau to disable it (to save battery, trees and lower temperature) or even have an external output (with Wayland). Now, the...
2002 May 01
1
ext3 assertion failure. repost sorry.
...ed c45c5800 c880538b c45c5800 c3a7f640 c8802811 c45c5800 c45c58e4 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c5583aa0 c20a2960 c0b87640 000000f0 c1498ae0 c033ab9c c019f880 Call Trace: [<c88093af>] __insmod_jbd_S.rodata_L96 [jbd] 0x285f [<c88052ff>] log_wait_commit_R6c342301 [jbd] 0xcf [<c880538b>] journal_bmap_Rbbdc8009 [jbd] 0x7b [<c8802811>] journal_flushpage_R40b21025 [jbd] 0xa21 [<c019f880>] do_rw_disk [kernel] 0x150 [<c011317e>] schedule [kernel] 0x26e [<c8804e3b>] journal_revoke_R67623458 [jbd] 0x5eb [<c8804d10>] journal_revoke_R67623458...
2008 Jul 24
4
umount oops
...erva kernel: [ 1532.886665] [btrfs:btrfs_wq_submit_bio+0xbe/0xf0] :btrfs:btrfs_wq_submit_bio+0xbe/0xf0 Jul 24 22:44:54 minerva kernel: [ 1532.886743] [btrfs:__btree_submit_bio_hook+0x0/0x60] :btrfs:__btree_submit_bio_hook+0x0/0x60 Jul 24 22:44:54 minerva kernel: [ 1532.886826] [btrfs:submit_one_bio+0xcf/0x120] :btrfs:submit_one_bio+0xcf/0x120 Jul 24 22:44:54 minerva kernel: [ 1532.886907] [btrfs:extent_write_full_page+0x9d/0xb0] :btrfs:extent_write_full_page+0x9d/0xb0 Jul 24 22:44:54 minerva kernel: [ 1532.886992] [btrfs:btree_get_extent+0x0/0x1f0] :btrfs:btree_get_extent+0x0/0x1f0 Jul 24 22:44:54...
2017 Oct 16
4
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...sh %r11 >>> 10: 48 83 ec 30 sub $0x30,%rsp >>> 14: 65 4c 8b 1c 25 c0 d2 mov %gs:0xd2c0,%r11 >>> 1b: 00 00 >>> 1d: 41 f7 03 df 39 08 90 testl $0x900839df,(%r11) >>> 24: 0f 85 a5 00 00 00 jne 0xcf >>> 2a: 50 push %rax >>> 2b:* ff 15 9c 95 d0 ff callq *-0x2f6a64(%rip) # >>> 0xffffffffffd095cd <-- trapping instruction >>> 31: 58 pop %rax >>> 32: 48 3d 4c 01...
2017 Oct 16
4
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...sh %r11 >>> 10: 48 83 ec 30 sub $0x30,%rsp >>> 14: 65 4c 8b 1c 25 c0 d2 mov %gs:0xd2c0,%r11 >>> 1b: 00 00 >>> 1d: 41 f7 03 df 39 08 90 testl $0x900839df,(%r11) >>> 24: 0f 85 a5 00 00 00 jne 0xcf >>> 2a: 50 push %rax >>> 2b:* ff 15 9c 95 d0 ff callq *-0x2f6a64(%rip) # >>> 0xffffffffffd095cd <-- trapping instruction >>> 31: 58 pop %rax >>> 32: 48 3d 4c 01...
2019 Dec 16
2
Tracking down severe regression in 5.3-rc4/5.4 for TU116 - assistance needed
...f >>> kernel: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: tmr: stalled at ffffffffffffffff >>> kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> kernel: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: timeout >>> kernel: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 384 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bar/g84.c:35 g84_bar_flush+0xcf/> 0xe0 [nouveau] >> >> (detailed log in a corresponding issue - [1]) >> >> With earlier kernels there was no hardware acceleration for NVidia GTX >> 1660 Ti, but at least I could use nouveau to disable it (to save >> battery, trees and lower temperature) or ev...
2009 Apr 15
1
hang with fsdlm
...a40 ffff88007ffee340 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa022bdbf>] ? dlm_put_lockspace+0x18/0x2b [dlm] [<ffffffff804f13e4>] schedule+0x9/0x1d [<ffffffff804f171d>] schedule_timeout+0x24/0x15e [<ffffffff804f1559>] ? wait_for_common+0x3c/0x123 [<ffffffff804f15ec>] wait_for_common+0xcf/0x123 [<ffffffff8023616f>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xf [<ffffffff804f16ca>] wait_for_completion+0x18/0x1a [<ffffffffa02d3755>] ocfs2_cluster_lock+0x91f/0x93e [ocfs2] [<ffffffff804f387f>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a [<ffffffffa02e59fb>] ? ocfs2_recovery_completed+...
2017 Oct 12
2
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...gt; e: 41 53 push %r11 > 10: 48 83 ec 30 sub $0x30,%rsp > 14: 65 4c 8b 1c 25 c0 d2 mov %gs:0xd2c0,%r11 > 1b: 00 00 > 1d: 41 f7 03 df 39 08 90 testl $0x900839df,(%r11) > 24: 0f 85 a5 00 00 00 jne 0xcf > 2a: 50 push %rax > 2b:* ff 15 9c 95 d0 ff callq *-0x2f6a64(%rip) # > 0xffffffffffd095cd <-- trapping instruction > 31: 58 pop %rax > 32: 48 3d 4c 01 00 00 cmp $0x14c,%rax >...
2017 Oct 12
2
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
...gt; e: 41 53 push %r11 > 10: 48 83 ec 30 sub $0x30,%rsp > 14: 65 4c 8b 1c 25 c0 d2 mov %gs:0xd2c0,%r11 > 1b: 00 00 > 1d: 41 f7 03 df 39 08 90 testl $0x900839df,(%r11) > 24: 0f 85 a5 00 00 00 jne 0xcf > 2a: 50 push %rax > 2b:* ff 15 9c 95 d0 ff callq *-0x2f6a64(%rip) # > 0xffffffffffd095cd <-- trapping instruction > 31: 58 pop %rax > 32: 48 3d 4c 01 00 00 cmp $0x14c,%rax >...
2008 Apr 10
1
fsfuzz testing: some results
...task.ti=f7945000) Stack: f3d6b400 f2455730 f288c400 00000000 000002f4 00000000 07b45000 00000000 0000394d 00000246 f7945c64 c041fec6 42a9fd92 00000172 027f9000 00000000 00000000 f7945d10 f8b9a246 027f9000 00000000 00000003 00000000 00000671 Call Trace: [<c041fec6>] ? hrtick_set+0xcf/0xd7 [<f8b9a246>] ? cow_file_range+0x15f/0x243 [btrfs] [<f8b9a89f>] ? run_delalloc_range+0x294/0x2b5 [btrfs] [<f8ba622b>] ? unlock_extent+0x17/0x19 [btrfs] [<f8ba69ed>] ? __extent_writepage+0x1a0/0x62d [btrfs] [<c0456f41>] ? write_cache_pages+0x180/0x287 [<f8b...
2011 Apr 26
4
RHEL 6/CentOS
...rdware_unsupported+0x37/0x40 [<c08056eb>] ? early_init_centaur+0xd/0x2d [<c0a49835>] ? early_cpu_init+0x11a/0x13e [<c0a453b3>] ? setup_arch+0x38/0xb90 [<c0450d3e>] ? vprintk+0x1ae/0x490 [<c080ba2a>] ? printk+0x17/0x1d [<c0a5a4ee>] ? cgroup_init_subsys+0xcf/0xdb [<c0a406da>] ? start_kernel+0xca/0x3a4 ---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]--- Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint I traced it down to this code, which is not in the standard kernel.org kernel-2.6.32.36: from kernel-2.6.32.36 static void __cpuinit early_init_centaur(struct cpu...