search for: 0x23c

...ity message from an ISDN PRI. I am trying to get Callerid name to work. The carrier says it on and I see it in the pri debug but asterisk never gets it. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks John Bittner Simlab.net Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=9 > Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 572/0x23C) (Terminator) > Message type: ALERTING (1) > [1e 02 81 88]I> > Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Private network serving the local user (1) > Ext: 1 Progress Description: Inband information or appro...

Well, it seems to be about time to have this conversation again. A rough overview of the previous thread and requirements is: 1. bzImage would not be a bare ELF file, but it would contain an ELF header+file within it 2. We need some way to add extra ELF notes into that ELF file 3. We use a "paravirtualized" bootloader type, with some other field to determine which

Well, it seems to be about time to have this conversation again. A rough overview of the previous thread and requirements is: 1. bzImage would not be a bare ELF file, but it would contain an ELF header+file within it 2. We need some way to add extra ELF notes into that ELF file 3. We use a "paravirtualized" bootloader type, with some other field to determine which

...lient_lookup_cbk+0x334)[0xb751ca84] /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/2.0.7/xlator/protocol/client.so(protocol_client_interpret+0x1ef)[0xb750c91f] /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/2.0.7/xlator/protocol/client.so(protocol_client_pollin+0xcd)[0xb750cb1d] /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/2.0.7/xlator/protocol/client.so(notify+0x23c)[0xb751359c] /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/2.0.7/transport/socket.so(socket_event_poll_in+0x3c)[0xb74abb2c] /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/2.0.7/transport/socket.so(socket_event_handler+0xa3)[0xb74abf73] /usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0[0xb7ed7409] /usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(event_dispatch+0x21)[0xb7ed6...

...): stub fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_GetBitmapBits (0x1cc, 0x7bc4fc94, 32): stub fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_GetBitmapBits (0x238, 0x7bc50bac, 32): stub fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_GetBitmapBits (0x234, 0x7bc50bcc, 32): stub fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_GetBitmapBits (0x240, 0x7bc50c14, 128): stub fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_GetBitmapBits (0x23c, 0x7bc50c94, 128): stub fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_GetBitmapBits (0x248, 0x7bc50d84, 32): stub fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_GetBitmapBits (0x244, 0x7bc50da4, 32): stub err:imagelist:ImageList_ReplaceIcon no color! fixme:ttydrv:TTYDRV_DC_StretchBlt (0x1d4, 0, 0, 16, 16, 0x250, 0, 0, 16, 32, 13369376): stub fixme:t...

...n(llvm::Function*, std::vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > const&, char const* const*)+0x25b)[0x8305ca5] lli(main+0x23c)[0x82aa058] /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe4)[0x42015574] lli(dlopen+0x41)[0x82a9d8d] Segmentation fault I have tried to have different function pointers, but ONLY pointers in position 0 in the map-struct works. If I try to access any other posistion, e.g. long 0, ubyte 1, this error come...

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 12:28 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > When box is earning its keep, nouveau/swiotlb grumble.. a LOT. The > > below is from master.today. > > > > [12594.640959] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 2097152 bytes) > > [12594.693000] nouveau

...vm::Function*, std::vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > const&, char const* const*)+0x25b)[0x8338111] lli(main+0x23c)[0x82db5dc] /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe4)[0x42015704] lli(dlopen+0x41)[0x82db311] Abort (core dumped) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: a.out.bc Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1092 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists....

...ip_vs_in.part.29.constprop.36+0x640/0x640 [ip_vs] [ 782.525600] nf_hook_slow+0x43/0xc0 [ 782.525602] ip_local_deliver+0xac/0xc0 [ 782.525604] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x400/0x400 [ 782.525606] ip_rcv+0x26c/0x380 [ 782.525610] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x3a0/0xb10 [ 782.525629] ? inet_gro_receive+0x23c/0x2b0 [ 782.525631] ? netif_receive_skb_internal+0x24/0xb0 [ 782.525633] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x24/0xb0 [ 782.525635] napi_gro_receive+0xb8/0xe0 [ 782.525638] xennet_poll+0x676/0xb40 [xen_netfront] [ 782.525641] net_rx_action+0x139/0x3a0 [ 782.525644] __do_softirq+0xde/0x2b4 [ 78...

On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:01:48AM +0200, Finn S Andersen wrote: > For some of the benchmarks the linear scan regalloc > works. When it does, results are in the x1.0 - 1.5 > range. Unfortunately, the linear scan allocator breaks > on most of my code. Is there a chance you can try cvs? I would be interested to get a simplified test case where the allocator breaks. A lot of

...m::Function*, std::vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > const&, char const* const*)+0x25b)[0x8305ca5] > lli(main+0x23c)[0x82aa058] > /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe4)[0x42015574] > lli(dlopen+0x41)[0x82a9d8d] > Segmentation fault > > I have tried to have different function pointers, but ONLY pointers in position 0 in the map-struct works. If I try to access any other posistion, e.g. long 0,...

...0x6d/0x80 <EOI> [<ffffffff8100a842>] ? hard_enable_TSC+0x2e/0x2e [<ffffffff8102fbe1>] ? native_safe_halt+0x2/0x3 [<ffffffff8100a853>] ? default_idle+0x11/0x14 [<ffffffff810ed4e7>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x153/0x1d2 [<ffffffff810277ad>] ? start_secondary+0x220/0x23c Code: 0c c5 40 50 87 81 49 8d 04 0c 48 8b 30 48 39 ee 75 ca 8a 40 08 38 d8 75 c3 48 c7 c0 22 b0 00 00 31 db 0f b7 0c 08 b8 05 00 00 00 <0f> 01 c1 5b 5d 41 5c c3 4c 8d 54 24 08 48 83 e4 f0 b9 0a 00 00 RIP [<ffffffff8102f0cc>] kvm_unlock_kick+0x63/0x6b RSP <ffff88007fc83db0> ---[...

...0x6d/0x80 <EOI> [<ffffffff8100a842>] ? hard_enable_TSC+0x2e/0x2e [<ffffffff8102fbe1>] ? native_safe_halt+0x2/0x3 [<ffffffff8100a853>] ? default_idle+0x11/0x14 [<ffffffff810ed4e7>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x153/0x1d2 [<ffffffff810277ad>] ? start_secondary+0x220/0x23c Code: 0c c5 40 50 87 81 49 8d 04 0c 48 8b 30 48 39 ee 75 ca 8a 40 08 38 d8 75 c3 48 c7 c0 22 b0 00 00 31 db 0f b7 0c 08 b8 05 00 00 00 <0f> 01 c1 5b 5d 41 5c c3 4c 8d 54 24 08 48 83 e4 f0 b9 0a 00 00 RIP [<ffffffff8102f0cc>] kvm_unlock_kick+0x63/0x6b RSP <ffff88007fc83db0> ---[...

...60_2ND_FP2/EPOC32/BUILD/SRC/SPEEX/SYMBIAN/SPEEX/ARMI/UREL/NB_CELP.o)(.text+0x1ac):Nb_celp.c: relocation truncated to fit: ARM_26 cos ..\..\..\SYMBIAN\8.0A\S60_2ND_FP2\EPOC32\RELEASE\ARMI\UREL\SPEEX.LIB(../../../SYMBIAN/8.0A/S60_2ND_FP2/EPOC32/BUILD/SRC/SPEEX/SYMBIAN/SPEEX/ARMI/UREL/NB_CELP.o)(.text+0x23c):Nb_celp.c: undefined reference to `cos' ..\..\..\SYMBIAN\8.0A\S60_2ND_FP2\EPOC32\RELEASE\ARMI\UREL\SPEEX.LIB(../../../SYMBIAN/8.0A/S60_2ND_FP2/EPOC32/BUILD/SRC/SPEEX/SYMBIAN/SPEEX/ARMI/UREL/NB_CELP.o)(.text+0x23c):Nb_celp.c: relocation truncated to fit: ARM_26 cos ..\..\..\SYMBIAN\8.0A\S60_2ND...

...6f175ea0 8d95ccfdffff lea edx,[ebp+0xfffffdcc] ss:0012aebc=01588000 6f175ea6 52 push edx 6f175ea7 8b45dc mov eax,[ebp-0x24] ss:01499af6=9ad00008 6f175eaa 50 push eax 6f175eab 8b8f3c020000 mov ecx,[edi+0x23c] ds:0012b954=00000000 FAULT ->6f175eb1 8b511c mov edx,[ecx+0x1c] ds:0136ea06=003f003f 6f175eb4 52 push edx 6f175eb5 ffd6 call esi 6f175eb7 85c0 test eax,eax 6f175eb9 740f jz 6f175eca...

...rage.so.0(mail_index_sync_get_atomic_map+0x18) [0x7f6dcbde9c88] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0xb7cf9) [0x7f6dcbde9cf9] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/lib dovecot-storage.so.0(mail_index_sync_record+0x7e6) [0x7f6dcbdea626] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mail_index_sync_map+0x23c) [0x7f6dcbdeae4c] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mail_index_m ap+0xa8) [0x7f6dcbddc2b8] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0xb42da) [0x7f6dcbde62da] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0xb458a) [0x7f6dcbde658a] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(...

...name: Notebook P65_P67RGRERA/P65_P67RGRERA, BIOS 1.05.16 05/16/2016 Workqueue: events_power_efficient srcu_invoke_callbacks Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 ___might_sleep+0x20c/0x240 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x4d/0x230 acpi_ut_evaluate_object+0x68/0x23c ? srcu_invoke_callbacks+0xa2/0x150 acpi_rs_get_prt_method_data+0x42/0xa2 acpi_get_irq_routing_table+0x70/0x9f ? __slab_free+0x11c/0x380 acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry+0x83/0x330 ? srcu_invoke_callbacks+0xa2/0x150 acpi_pci_irq_lookup+0x27/0x2e0 acpi_pci_irq_disab...

...>height); - printformat((pmPict->format)); - } - ErrorF("\n"); -#endif - if (pmPict) { if (!NV30EXATexture(pScrn, pmPix, pmPict, 1)) { MARK_UNDO(chan); @@ -533,7 +475,7 @@ NV30EXAPrepareComposite(int op, PicturePtr psPict, return FALSE; } - BEGIN_RING(chan, rankine, 0x23c, 1); + BEGIN_RING(chan, rankine, NV34TCL_TX_UNITS_ENABLE, 1); OUT_RING (chan, pmPict?3:1); pNv->alu = op; @@ -550,13 +492,12 @@ NV30EXAPrepareComposite(int op, PicturePtr psPict, #define xFixedToFloat(v) \ ((float)xFixedToInt((v)) + ((float)xFixedFrac(v) / 65536.0)) -static void +sta...

Hi, I have a question about x86 code quality. I have run a few benchmarks and compared the running time of executables created by LLVM to executables created by gcc. It appears that code generated by LLVM is x1.5 - x3 times slower than code generated by gcc, for the x86 For some of the benchmarks the linear scan regalloc works. When it does, results are in the x1.0 - 1.5 range. Unfortunately,

...uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dump Card State Begins <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ahd0: Dumping Card State at program address 0x23c Mode 0x0 Card was paused INTSTAT[0x0] SELOID[0x2] SELID[0x30] HS_MAILBOX[0x0] INTCTL[0x80]:(SWTMINTMASK) SEQINTSTAT[0x0] SAVED_MODE[0x11] DFFSTAT[0x33]:(CURRFIFO_NONE|FIFO0FREE|FIFO1FREE) SCSISIGI[0x0]:(P_DATAOUT) SCSIPHASE[0x0] SCSIBUS[0x0] LASTPHASE[0x1]:(P_DATAOUT|P_BUSFREE) SCSISEQ0[0x0] S...