search for: 0x1000100l

...ome > unknown reason, defines > > #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x20000000L > > No idea why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL v2.0.0. A > local fix, if you need one, is to use > > #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L > #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000100L > #endif > > in dcrypt-openssl.c after includes. > > Aki > > > On 02.11.2016 12:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Those are used if >> >> #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L >> >> So (your) libressl is providing this define....

...ne OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x20000000L >>> >>> No idea why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL v2.0.0. A >>> local fix, if you need one, is to use >>> >>> #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L >>> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000100L >>> #endif >>> >>> in dcrypt-openssl.c after includes. >>> >>> Aki >>> >>> >>> On 02.11.2016 12:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Those are used if >>>> >>>> #if...

...MBER 0x20000000L >>>> >>>> No idea why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL v2.0.0. A >>>> local fix, if you need one, is to use >>>> >>>> #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L >>>> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000100L >>>> #endif >>>> >>>> in dcrypt-openssl.c after includes. >>>> >>>> Aki >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02.11.2016 12:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> Those are u...

Hi! Those are used if #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L So (your) libressl is providing this define. We compile our code using GCC and CLANG regularly, with OpenSSL v1.0.x which is the currently officially supported one. Aki On 02.11.2016 12:34, Ruga wrote: > dovecot 2.2.26.0 uses the following functions, which are not available on libressl 2.4.3: > > HMAC_CTX_new >

...y myself, I noticed that libressl, for some unknown reason, defines #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x20000000L No idea why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL v2.0.0. A local fix, if you need one, is to use #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000100L #endif in dcrypt-openssl.c after includes. Aki On 02.11.2016 12:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Hi! > > Those are used if > > #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L > > So (your) libressl is providing this define. We compile our code using > GCC and CLANG regularly, with O...

...>> >> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x20000000L >> >> No idea why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL v2.0.0. A >> local fix, if you need one, is to use >> >> #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L >> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000100L >> #endif >> >> in dcrypt-openssl.c after includes. >> >> Aki >> >> >> On 02.11.2016 12:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Those are used if >>> >>> #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10100000L >>&g...

...R 0x20000000L >>>> >>>> No idea why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL v2.0.0. A >>>> local fix, if you need one, is to use >>>> >>>> #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L >>>> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000100L >>>> #endif >>>> >>>> in dcrypt-openssl.c after includes. >>>> >>>> Aki >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02.11.2016 12:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> Those are u...

...;>>> >>>>> No idea why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL v2.0.0. A >>>>> local fix, if you need one, is to use >>>>> >>>>> #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L >>>>> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000100L >>>>> #endif >>>>> >>>>> in dcrypt-openssl.c after includes. >>>>> >>>>> Aki >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02.11.2016 12:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>>>>> Hi! >>>>&...

...why they decided to advertise that they are OpenSSL >>>>>> v2.0.0. A >>>>>> local fix, if you need one, is to use >>>>>> >>>>>> #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L >>>>>> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000100L >>>>>> #endif >>>>>> >>>>>> in dcrypt-openssl.c after includes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Aki >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 02.11.2016 12:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>>&g...