Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0x10000000000000ull".
Did you mean:
0x100000000000ull
2008 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] Merge Patch File
Hi Bill, thanks for fixing it.
> > ../../gcc-4.2.llvm.master/gcc/config/i386/i386.c: In function 'ix86_expand_convert_uns_DI2DF_sse':
> > ../../gcc-4.2.llvm.master/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:10270: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type
> > ../../gcc-4.2.llvm.master/gcc/config/i386/i386.c: In function 'ix86_expand_convert_sign_DI2DF_sse':
2008 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Merge Patch File
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> > The LLVM GCC merge patch file is available here:
> >
> > http://nondot.org/~void/llvm-r139307-r142930.diff.gz
> >
> > Share and enjoy!
>
> On x86-linux:
>
> ../../gcc-4.2.llvm.master/gcc/config/i386/i386.c: In function 'output_pic_addr_const':
>
2008 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Merge Patch File
...t; > These aren't from the patch...
>
> Yup, it's been like that for ever. I was secretly hoping you would
> fix them too :)
>
:-) Yeah, I looked at the code and didn't know of a good way to tackle
it...I'm *assuming* that it's complaining about this value:
0x10000000000000ULL
but can't be for sure. I'm nervous dealing with the
REAL_VALUE_FROM_INT functions...
-bw