Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "0x05vorbis".
2016 May 11
2
Ogg Format
On 10/05/16 02:37 PM, Amit Ashara wrote:
> Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows
> up Vorbis but not Opus.
The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is
different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01
value in an extra byte after the last tag.
The OpusTag packet layout is described in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2
Common tag names used for interoperability are described in the Vorbis
documentation. See https://www.xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-commen...
2016 May 11
3
Ogg Format
...M, Amit Ashara wrote:
>
> > Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows
> > up Vorbis but not Opus.
>
> The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is
> different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01
> value in an extra byte after the last tag.
>
> The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2
>
> Common tag names used for interoperability are described in the Vorbis
> docu...
2016 May 12
2
Antw: Re: Ogg Format
...there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always
>> shows
>> > > up Vorbis but not Opus.
>> >
>> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is
>> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01
>> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
>> >
>> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
>> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2
>> >
>> > Common tag names used for inter...
2016 May 11
1
Ogg Format
...> Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows
> > > up Vorbis but not Opus.
> >
> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is
> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01
> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
> >
> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2
> >
> > Common tag names used for intero...
2016 May 11
0
Ogg Format
...n 10/05/16 02:37 PM, Amit Ashara wrote:
>
> > Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows
> > up Vorbis but not Opus.
>
> The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is
> different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01
> value in an extra byte after the last tag.
>
> The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2
>
> Common tag names used for interoperability are described in the Vorbis
> documentation. See https:/...
2016 May 12
2
Ogg Format
...rch always
> >> shows
> >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus.
> >> >
> >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic
> signature' is
> >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis
> puts a 0x01
> >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
> >> >
> >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2
> >> &...
2016 May 11
0
Ogg Format
...gt; > > Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always
> shows
> > > up Vorbis but not Opus.
> >
> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is
> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01
> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
> >
> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2
> >
> > Common tag names used for interoperability are described...
2016 May 09
4
Ogg Format
Amit Ashara wrote:
> 1. Since the stream I am working with is a mono channel, what should be
> the advised page_segments to use. I am using an embedded system so
> keeping the flash and SRAM usage are vital for the development.
The number of channels has no impact on this at all.
> 2. In the OpusTag the is the libopus a mandatory field?
Yes.
2016 May 12
0
Ogg Format
...sTag structure? Search
> always
> >> shows
> >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus.
> >> >
> >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature'
> is
> >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a
> 0x01
> >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
> >> >
> >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2
> >> >
> >> >...
2016 May 12
3
Ogg Format
...gt; >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus.
> > >> >
> > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic
> > signature' is
> > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis
> > puts a 0x01
> > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
> > >> >
> > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> > >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html...
2016 May 12
0
Ogg Format
...gt; shows
> > >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus.
> > >> >
> > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic
> > signature' is
> > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis
> > puts a 0x01
> > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
> > >> >
> > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> > >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#sectio...
2016 May 12
2
Ogg Format
...not Opus.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the
>> 'magic
>> > > signature' is
>> > > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and
>> vorbis
>> > > puts a 0x01
>> > > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
>> >...
2016 May 12
0
Ogg Format
...; > up Vorbis but not Opus.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic
> > > signature' is
> > > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and
> vorbis
> > > puts a 0x01
> > > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
> > > >> >...
2016 May 13
0
Ogg Format
...gt; >> >
> > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but
> the 'magic
> > > signature' is
> > > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of
> '0x05vorbis') and vorbis
> > > puts a 0x01
> > > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in
>...