search for: 0x05vorbis

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "0x05vorbis".

2016 May 11
2
Ogg Format
On 10/05/16 02:37 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows > up Vorbis but not Opus. The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01 value in an extra byte after the last tag. The OpusTag packet layout is described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2 Common tag names used for interoperability are described in the Vorbis documentation. See https://www.xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-commen...
2016 May 11
3
Ogg Format
...M, Amit Ashara wrote: > > > Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows > > up Vorbis but not Opus. > > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01 > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2 > > Common tag names used for interoperability are described in the Vorbis > docu...
2016 May 12
2
Antw: Re: Ogg Format
...there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always >> shows >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus. >> > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01 >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag. >> > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2 >> > >> > Common tag names used for inter...
2016 May 11
1
Ogg Format
...> Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows > > > up Vorbis but not Opus. > > > > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is > > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01 > > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > > > > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2 > > > > Common tag names used for intero...
2016 May 11
0
Ogg Format
...n 10/05/16 02:37 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > > > Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always shows > > up Vorbis but not Opus. > > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01 > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2 > > Common tag names used for interoperability are described in the Vorbis > documentation. See https:/...
2016 May 12
2
Ogg Format
...rch always > >> shows > >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus. > >> > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic > signature' is > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis > puts a 0x01 > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > >> > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2 > >> &...
2016 May 11
0
Ogg Format
...gt; > > Is there a format document on the OpusTag structure? Search always > shows > > > up Vorbis but not Opus. > > > > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' is > > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a 0x01 > > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > > > > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2 > > > > Common tag names used for interoperability are described...
2016 May 09
4
Ogg Format
Amit Ashara wrote: > 1. Since the stream I am working with is a mono channel, what should be > the advised page_segments to use. I am using an embedded system so > keeping the flash and SRAM usage are vital for the development. The number of channels has no impact on this at all. > 2. In the OpusTag the is the libopus a mandatory field? Yes.
2016 May 12
0
Ogg Format
...sTag structure? Search > always > >> shows > >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus. > >> > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic signature' > is > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis puts a > 0x01 > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > >> > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#section-5.2 > >> > > >> >...
2016 May 12
3
Ogg Format
...gt; >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus. > > >> > > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic > > signature' is > > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis > > puts a 0x01 > > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > > >> > > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > > >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html...
2016 May 12
0
Ogg Format
...gt; shows > > >> > > up Vorbis but not Opus. > > >> > > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic > > signature' is > > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and vorbis > > puts a 0x01 > > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > > >> > > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > > >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7845.html#sectio...
2016 May 12
2
Ogg Format
...not Opus. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the >> 'magic >> > > signature' is >> > > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and >> vorbis >> > > puts a 0x01 >> > > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in >> >...
2016 May 12
0
Ogg Format
...; > up Vorbis but not Opus. > > > >> > > > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but the 'magic > > > signature' is > > > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of '0x05vorbis') and > vorbis > > > puts a 0x01 > > > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > > > >> > > > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in > > > >> >...
2016 May 13
0
Ogg Format
...gt; >> > > > > >> > The basic format is shared with Vorbis, but > the 'magic > > > signature' is > > > >> > different ('OpusTags' instead of > '0x05vorbis') and vorbis > > > puts a 0x01 > > > >> > value in an extra byte after the last tag. > > > >> > > > > >> > The OpusTag packet layout is described in >...