Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "0x03d3".
Did you mean:
0x03d4
2017 Apr 10
0
[PATCH 04/11] nvkm/ramgt215: Move ram training up the chain
...- struct gf100_ram *ram = gf100_ram(base);
- struct nvkm_device *device = ram->base.fb->subdev.device;
- int i;
+ struct nvkm_subdev *subdev = &ram->fb->subdev;
+ struct nvkm_device *device = subdev->device;
+ int i, j;
- switch (ram->base.type) {
+ if ((train->mask & 0x03d3) != 0x03d3) {
+ nvkm_warn(subdev, "missing link training data\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 0x30; i++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < 8; j += 4) {
+ nvkm_wr32(device, 0x10f968 + j, 0x00000000 | (i << 8));
+ nvkm_wr32(device, 0x10f920 + j, 0x00000000 |
+ tr...
2017 Apr 10
0
[PATCH 05/11] nvkm/ramgf100: Don't mandate training pattern 4
...--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ gf100_ram_train_init_0(struct nvkm_ram *ram, struct gt215_ram_train *train)
struct nvkm_device *device = subdev->device;
int i, j;
- if ((train->mask & 0x03d3) != 0x03d3) {
+ if ((train->mask & 0x03c3) != 0x03c3) {
nvkm_warn(subdev, "missing link training data\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -575,10 +575,13 @@ gf100_ram_train_init_0(struct nvkm_ram *ram, struct gt215_ram_train *train)
}
}
- for (j = 0; j < 8; j += 4) {
- for...
2017 Apr 10
11
Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches
contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to
move upstream. Notable changes
- Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+
- Timing calculation for Fermi
- GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that
pesky GT 240.
- A routine to translate a VBIOS init
2017 Apr 10
14
RESEND Preparations for Fermi DRAM clock changes
Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing
changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order
in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise.
Original message:
No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches
contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to
move upstream. Notable changes
- Training pattern