Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "0vkiuhn10ne".
2019 Feb 03
3
RFC: Modernizing our use of auto
...t need to update the guideline on auto to be able to use auto in
lambda as soon as c++14 is available.
> This feature was celebrated as a big
> feature which gets unlocked by migrating to toolchains which provide
> that feature:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/llvm-dev/0VkIuhn10nE/QZ5FwYEmHAAJ
>
> So, does this need a guideline update?
>
> Is there consistency in celbrating that but writing 'remove all use of
> auto from this file' in reviews?
>
> If there's no consensus and no consistency, what does that mean for the
> code?
>
> Is...
2018 Dec 31
4
RFC: Modernizing our use of auto
On Dec 16, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Stephen Kelly via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On 25/11/2018 14:43, Stephen Kelly via llvm-dev wrote:
>> However this is a proposal for more modern thinking regarding the permissiveness of auto in LLVM codebases.
>> Currently the rule on the use of auto is here:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the input on this topic,