search for: 0h0m

...ing will run for about 3 hours. But after enabling hourly snapshots I noticed that zfs scrub is always restarted if a new snapshot is created - so basically it will never have the chance to finish: # zpool scrub scratch # zpool status scratch | grep scrub scrub: scrub in progress, 1.90% done, 0h0m to go # zfs snapshot scratch at test # zpool status scratch | grep scrub scrub: scrub stopped with 0 errors on Thu Jun 22 18:15:49 2006 # zpool status scratch | grep scrub scrub: scrub in progress, 7.36% done, 0h1m to go # zfs snapshot scratch at test2 # zpool status scratch | grep scrub scru...

Hi, once I created a zpool of single vdevs not using mirroring of any kind. Now I wonder if it''s possible to add vdevs and mirror the currently existing ones. Thanks, budy -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

...the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the errors using ''zpool clear'' or replace the device with ''zpool replace''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P scrub: resilver in progress for 0h0m, 0.00% done, 57h3m to go config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rc-pool DEGRADED 0 0 0 mirror DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 5.56M resilvered replacing DEGRADED...

...pool offline test <disk3> cannot offline <disk3>: no valid replicas 3. Resilver reported without a reason. # zpool create test mirror disk0 disk1 # zpool offline test disk0 # zpool export test # zpool import test # zpool status test | grep scrub scrub: resilver completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Sun May 4 15:57:47 2008 What ZFS tries to resilver here? I verified that disk0 is not touched (which is expected behaviour). 4. Inconsistent ''zpool status'' output for log vdevs. (I''ll show only relevant parts of ''zpool status''....

...anding or a terrible case of RTFM? Another irrirating observation was, that scrubbing starts, then stalls for a minute or so at 0.4 something percent and then continues. Any ideas / pointers / ... ? Jens --- bash-3.2# zpool status tank pool: tank state: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Sun Aug 3 18:46:51 2008 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 c4d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors bash-3.2# uname -X System = SunOS Node = opensolaris Release = 5.11 KernelID = snv_94 Machine =...

...i list, Here''s my case : pool: mypool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will continue to function, possibly in a degraded state. action: Wait for the resilver to complete. scrub: resilver in progress for 147h19m, 100.00% done, 0h0m to go config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM filerbackup13 DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 replacing DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t9d0 OFFLI...

...ne or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Attach the missing device and online it using ''zpool online''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-2Q scrub: resilver completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Mon Nov 24 20:06:48 2008 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypooladas DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0...

So, my Areca controller has been complaining via email of read errors for a couple days on SATA channel 8. The disk finally gave up last night at 17:40. I got to say I really appreciate the Areca controller taking such good care of me. For some reason, I wasn''t able to log into the server last night or in the morning, probably because my home dir was on the zpool with the failed disk

...is is a 6 drive mirrored pool with a single SSD for L2Arc cache. Pool version 26 under Nexenta Core Platform 3.0 with a LSI 9200-16E and SATA disks. $ zpool status bigboy pool: bigboy state: ONLINE scan: scrub in progress since Sat Feb 5 02:22:18 2011 3.74T scanned out of 3.74T at 141M/s, 0h0m to go 37.9M repaired, 99.88% done [-----config snip - all columns 0, one drive on the right has "(repairing)"----] errors: No known data errors And then once the scrub completes: $ zpool status bigboy pool: bigboy state: ONLINE scan: scrub repaired 37.9M in 7h42m with 0 errors o...

...tempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the errors using 'zpool clear' or replace the device with 'zpool replace'. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P scan: resilvered 27.2M in 0h0m with 0 errors on Thu Jul 4 19:47:44 2013 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 12 0 multipath/newdisk4 ONLINE 0 27 0 multipath/newdisk2 ONLINE...

Hello everyone, As one of the steps of improving my ZFS home fileserver (snv_134) I wanted to replace a 1TB disk with a newer one of the same vendor/model/size because this new one has 64MB cache vs. 16MB in the previous one. The removed disk will be use for backups, so I thought it''s better off to have a 64MB cache disk in the on-line pool than in the backup set sitting off-line all

Hi all, I''m trying to delete a zpool and when I do, I get this error: # zpool destroy oradata_fs1 cannot open ''oradata_fs1'': I/O error # The pools I have on this box look like this: #zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT oradata_fs1 532G 119K 532G 0% DEGRADED - rpool 136G 28.6G 107G 21% ONLINE - # Why

Hi there! I am new to the list, and to OpenSolaris, as well as ZPS. I am creating a zpool/zfs to use on my NAS server, and basically I want some redundancy for my files/media. What I am looking to do, is get a bunch of 2TB drives, and mount them mirrored, and in a zpool so that I don''t have to worry about running out of room. (I know, pretty typical I guess). My problem is, is that

While testing a zpool with a different storage adapter using my "blkdev" device, I did a test which made a disk unavailable -- all attempts to read from it report EIO. I expected my configuration (which is a 3 disk test, with 2 disks in a RAIDZ and a hot spare) to work where the hot spare would automatically be activated. But I''m finding that ZFS does not behave this way

...0 c7t0d5 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d7 ONLINE 0 0 0 logs c19d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: xx2 state: ONLINE scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h0m with 0 errors on Thu Oct 7 17:32:11 2010 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM xx2 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t50014EE2AF54BB46d0 ONLINE 0 0...

We have a Mirror setup in ZFS that''s 73GB (two internal disks on a sun fire v440). We currently are going to attach this system to an Equallogic Box, and will attach an ISCSCI LUN from the Equallogic box to the v440 of about 200gb. The Equallogic Box is configured as a Hardware Raid 50 (two hot spares for redundancy). My question is what''s the best approach to moving the ZFS

I''m using zfs not to have access to a fail-safe backed up system, but to easily manage my file system. I would like to be able to, as I buy new harddrives, just to be able to replace the old ones. I''m very environmentally concious, so I don''t want to leave old drives in there to consume power as they''ve already been replaced by larger ones. However, ZFS

zdb -C shows an shift value on each vdev in my pool, I was just wondering if it is vdev specific, or pool wide. Google didn''t seem to know. I''m considering a mixed pool with some "advanced format" (4KB sector) drives, and some normal 512B sector drives, and was wondering if the ashift can be set per vdev, or only per pool. Theoretically, this would save me some size on

This might be a stupid question, but here goes... Would adding, say, 4 4 or 8gb usb keys as a zil make enough of a difference for writes on an iscsi shared vol? I am finding reads are not too bad (40is mb/s over gige on 2 500gb drives stripped) but writes top out at about 10 and drop a lot lower... If I where to add a couple usb keys for zil, would it make a difference? Thanks. Sent from a