search for: 0f64282

...make sure it's still alive? > Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > index 0f64282..8c05001 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > @@ -892,7 +892,8 @@ static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) > } > > del_gendisk(vblk->disk); > - blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue); > + if (!vdev->surp...

...make sure it's still alive? > Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > index 0f64282..8c05001 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > @@ -892,7 +892,8 @@ static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) > } > > del_gendisk(vblk->disk); > - blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue); > + if (!vdev->surp...

Hi, here is an updated patch-set to my v2 RFC virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver This RFC introduces a new virtio_device entry 'surprize_removal' instead of a new 'notify' callback in struct virtio_driver. When an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due to the lost

Hi, here is an updated patch-set to my v2 RFC virtio: add new notify() callback to virtio_driver This RFC introduces a new virtio_device entry 'surprize_removal' instead of a new 'notify' callback in struct virtio_driver. When an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due to the lost

...s is a weird situation, and most likely not 'serializable'. Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 2d43be4..0f64282 100644 --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c @@ -875,6 +875,7 @@ static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) { struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv; int index = vblk->index; + unsigned long flags; int refc; /* Prevent config work handler from...

...s is a weird situation, and most likely not 'serializable'. Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 0f64282..8c05001 100644 --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c @@ -892,7 +892,8 @@ static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) } del_gendisk(vblk->disk); - blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue); + if (!vdev->surprize_removal) + blk_cleanup_queue(vblk-...

...> >> Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> --- >> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >> index 0f64282..8c05001 100644 >> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >> @@ -892,7 +892,8 @@ static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) >> } >> >> del_gendisk(vblk->disk); >> - blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue...