Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "0ece7bc9".
2018 Apr 02
0
[RFC] [lit] Report line numbers for failed RUN commands
Seems useful, but the current output is quite verbose.
Wouldn’t just
RUN:1; ls
be sufficient in place of
'RUN: at line 1’; ls
?
I’m also curious about the implementation, I recall there was a discussion about forcing all tests to use internal shell?
In that case a trick with a no-op “:” command would not be necessary.
George
> On Apr 2, 2018, at 1:25 PM, Joel E. Denny via llvm-dev
2018 Apr 02
2
[RFC] [lit] Report line numbers for failed RUN commands
When some lit tests fail, I find it time-consuming to locate the source
line of the failing RUN command. Running lit with -vv (or just -v in the
case of the internal shell) makes it easier because it prints an expanded
version of each RUN command as it executes, but it can still be challenging
because lit doesn't provide the RUN command's source line number.
While I haven't