search for: 0ead2f2f

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > On 05/06/2013 08:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > >> It's working fine just that it's ugly to see those APP/NOAPP markers. >>> >> Inline assembly is inline assembly. It has the semantics defined in >> the IL documentation and should all be treated uniformly. >> >>

On 05/06/2013 08:51 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >> It's working fine just that it's ugly to see those APP/NOAPP markers. > Inline assembly is inline assembly. It has the semantics defined in > the IL documentation and should all be treated uniformly. > > I guess I would be OK with unconditionally removing those comments (I > don't see a lot of value in them) or

...asm generation to another place, I won't get those. It's just because the compiler is doing what I user would do that I'm getting them. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130516/0ead2f2f/attachment.html>