Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "0e2f65e1".
2013 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] removing unnecessary ZEXT
...Type-legalizer discover this information when lowering the truncate?
Is the problem that this knowledge is not know in the DAG, only in the IR?
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130911/0e2f65e1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: arm-strcspn.s
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1710 bytes
Desc: arm-strcspn.s
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130911/0e2f65e1/attachment.obj>
2013 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] removing unnecessary ZEXT
On Sep 10, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Robert Lytton <robert at xmos.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A bit more information.
> I believe my problem lies with the fact that the load is left as 'anyext from i8'.
> On the XCore target we know this will become an 8bit zext load - as there is no 8bit sign extended load!
> If BB#1 were to force the load to a "zext from i8" would