Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0e2b531".
Did you mean:
025531
2015 Apr 30
0
[PATCH 5/6] x86: switch config from UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK to INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
...ot;
select PREEMPT_COUNT
- select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
help
This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
index db3ccb1..0e2b531 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ void __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_bh(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_spin_lock_bh);
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
+#ifndef CONFIG_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
void __lockfunc _raw_spin_unlock(ra...
2015 Apr 30
12
[PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead
Paravirtualized spinlocks produce some overhead even if the kernel is
running on bare metal. The main reason are the more complex locking
and unlocking functions. Especially unlocking is no longer just one
instruction but so complex that it is no longer inlined.
This patch series addresses this issue by adding two more pvops
functions to reduce the size of the inlined spinlock functions. When
2015 Apr 30
12
[PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead
Paravirtualized spinlocks produce some overhead even if the kernel is
running on bare metal. The main reason are the more complex locking
and unlocking functions. Especially unlocking is no longer just one
instruction but so complex that it is no longer inlined.
This patch series addresses this issue by adding two more pvops
functions to reduce the size of the inlined spinlock functions. When