Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0e07b7af".
2013 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm] r184698 - Add a flag to defer vectorization into a phase after the inliner and its
...LSR
}
SLP Vectorize
}
We might need to pull some things like exit value replacement out of IndvarSimplify into target-independent loop opts.
-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130624/0e07b7af/attachment.html>
2013 Jun 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm] r184698 - Add a flag to defer vectorization into a phase after the inliner and its
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote:
> I agree. The vectorizer is a *lowering* pass, and much like LSR and it
> loses information. A few months ago some of us talked about this and came
> up with a general draft for the ideal pass ordering.
>
Where? On the mailing list?
> If I remember correctly the plan was that the second half of the
2013 Jun 24
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm] r184698 - Add a flag to defer vectorization into a phase after the inliner and its
>
> Just for the record, I have no real expectation that this is a good idea yet... But it's hard to collect numbers without a flag of some kind, and it's also really annoying to craft this flag given the current pass manager, so I figured I would get a skeleton in place that folks could experiment with, and we could keep or delete based on this discussion and any numbers.
I agree.