search for: 0d000000

...spoolss_ClosePrinter: struct spoolss_ClosePrinter in: struct spoolss_ClosePrinter handle : * handle: struct policy_handle handle_type : 0x00000000 (0) uuid : 0d000000-0000-0000-5b53-ba4750120000 [2014/04/26 12:14:28.879690, 1] ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:284(ndr_print_function_debug) spoolss_ClosePrinter: struct spoolss_ClosePrinter in: struct spoolss_ClosePrinter handle : * handle: struct policy_handle...

...000 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 A1 0f 000 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 A9 IO APIC #2...... .... register #00: 02000000 ....... : physical APIC id: 02 .... register #01: 000F0011 ....... : max redirection entries: 000F ....... : IO APIC version: 0011 .... register #02: 0D000000 ....... : arbitration: 0D .... IRQ redirection table: NR Log Phy Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dest Deli Vect: 00 0FF 0F 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B1 01 0FF 0F 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B9 02 0FF 0F 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 C1 03 0FF 0F 1 1 0 1 0 1 1...

Some users are hitting this panic in network_alloc_rx_buffers() when running a big network intensive app: /* Check return status of HYPERVISOR_dom_mem_op(). */ if ( rx_mcl[nr_pfns].args[5] != nr_pfns ) panic("Unable to reduce memory reservation\n"); I''m not clear on what is happening here. Are the domains changing size? Which memory reservation is being

Hi, I have this bug when I activate java-6-jdk on Tomcat 5.5.26 in a Lenny Guest : Jul 31 21:24:15 tomcat01 kernel: 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 3 Jul 31 21:24:15 tomcat01 kernel: call 1/1: op=14 arg=[b7f1a000] result=-22 Jul 31 21:24:15 tomcat01 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Jul 31 21:24:15 tomcat01 kernel: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:103! Jul 31 21:24:15 tomcat01