Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0c14573c".
2008 May 16
2
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
...t i32 %tmp2
}
Meanwhile, the FrontEnd is consistent with the calling convention and
produce the correct IR with necessary promotions.
Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080516/0c14573c/attachment.html>
2008 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
On May 16, 2008, at 11:12 AM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com
> wrote:
>
> Chris,
> I did not quite understand the “The bad thing about …” part of your
> argument. I’m not sure which of the two scenarios are you comparing
> (promoting in FrontEnd vs BackEnd) or (promotion to int vs i32)
Assume we make the change I
2008 May 16
4
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
Chris,
I did not quite understand the "The bad thing about ..." part of your
argument. I'm not sure which of the two scenarios are you comparing
(promoting in FrontEnd vs BackEnd) or (promotion to int vs i32)
Regardless, I agree with you and shap that promotions should take place
in the FrontEnd and this is my reason:
The standard allows calling a function without prototype and