search for: 0bytes

...VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS   VBD_OO   VBD_RD   VBD_WR  VBD_RSECT  VBD_WSECT SSID   BuildEnv --b---        296    2.1    1052640   17.1    1052672      17.1     2    1        0        0    1        0        0        0          0          0    0 Net0 RX:        0bytes        0pkts        0err        0drop  TX:        0bytes        0pkts        0err     4624drop Database01 --b---        311    1.3     790496   12.8     790528      12.8     2    1        0        0    1        0        0        0          0          0    0 Net0 RX: ...

...ed, failures, status ml01 296 279.1MB 6761635 29006 in progress ml25 1208 1.1GB 6167501 75131 in progress ml26 0 0Bytes 7197961 0 in progress ml29 0 0Bytes 5892140 0 in progress ml30 118486 74.3GB 5867068 107288 in progress...

...size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -------------- localhost 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 in progress 0:0:0 GFSRV18 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 in progress 0:0:0 GFSRV20 0 0Bytes...

...lanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in secs --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -------------- localhost 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed 0.00 10.239.40.9 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed 0.00 10.239.40.8 0 0Bytes...

Hi At this point I already detached Hot Tier volume to run rebalance. Many volume settings only take effect for the new data (or rebalance), so I thought may this was the case with Hot Tier as well. Once rebalance finishes, I'll re-attache hot tier. cluster.write-freq-threshold and cluster.read-freq-threshold control number of times data is read/write before it moved to hot tier. In my case

Hi, You have missed the log files. Can you attach them? On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Dmitri Chebotarov <4dimach at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > At this point I already detached Hot Tier volume to run rebalance. Many > volume settings only take effect for the new data (or rebalance), so I > thought may this was the case with Hot Tier as well. Once rebalance > finishes,

...ipped status >> run time in secs >> --------- ----------- >> ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- >> ------------ -------------- >> localhost 0 >> 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed >> 0.00 >> 10.239.40.9 0 >> 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed >> 0.00 >>...

...d failures skipped status > run time in secs > --------- ----------- > ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > ------------ -------------- > localhost 0 > 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed > 0.00 > 10.239.40.9 0 > 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed > 0.00 > 10.239.40.8...

...in secs >> >> --------- ----------- >> >> ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- >> >> ------------ -------------- >> >> localhost 0 >> >> 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed >> >> 0.00 >> >> 10.239.40.9 0 >> >> 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed >> >> 0.00...

Hi all, I''ve a Xen server (Xen 3.1 compiled from sources [stable downloaded last wed...], CentOS 5 as the host OS, HP Proliant G5 6Gb ram with Broadcom NetXtreme 2) with 4 guests, each running Windows 2003 just installed, with nothing else. Network is configured with the default bridging script, no changes. I''m using 1 network card only for the moment. All guests run apparently

...; >> run time in secs > >> --------- ----------- > >> ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > >> ------------ -------------- > >> localhost 0 > >> 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed > >> 0.00 > >> 10.239.40.9 0 > >> 0Bytes 0 0 0 failed > >> 0.00 > >>...

...--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -------------- localhost 300 100.1MB 600 0 completed 600.00 s6n12.testing.lan 0 0Bytes 0 0 not started 0.00 s6n11.testing.lan 0 0Bytes 0 0 not started 0.00 s5n10.testing.lan 0 0Bytes 301 0 completed...

...B # 128KB is default option #option priority *.h:3,*.html:2,*:1 # default is '*:0' #option force-revalidate-timeout 2 # default is 1 subvolumes unify0-raw end-volume volume unify0-writebehind type performance/write-behind option aggregate-size 1MB # default is 0bytes #option window-size 3MB # default is 0bytes option flush-behind on # default is 'off' subvolumes unify0-io-cache end-volume volume unify0 type features/fixed-id option fixed-uid 99 option fixed-gid 99 subvolumes unify0-io-cache end-volume

...r a few hours, I noticed a large number of failures in the rebalance status: > Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures > status > --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > ------------ > localhost 0 0Bytes 4288805 0 > stopped > ml55 26275 206.2MB 4277101 14159 > stopped > ml29 0 0Bytes 4288844 0 > stopped > ml31 0 0Bytes 4288937 0 &...

...s for local moh. I put the following line on my musiconhold.conf default=>custom:/var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3-dummy,/usr/bin/mpg123 -q -s --mono -r 8000 -f 8192 http://10.0.0.90:9000/stream.mp3 where 10.0.0.90:9000 is my slim server. On /var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3-dummy I have an empty mp3 file with 0bytes. This doesn't work at all (for example using the following extension) exten => 64,1,Answer exten => 64,2,MusicOnHold(default) exten => 64,3,Hangup I have converted my mp3 files so that they have the following characteristics )but I don't really think this matters since when the...

Hello everybody! Some time ago I''ve decided that using the MARK property of the Linux IP packet structure for the needs of traffic control is not very useful. So I wrote an iptables patch called IPCLASSIFY. It is fully based on IPMARK but it uses the PRIORITY field instead of MARK. The relation between IPCLASSIFY<->CLASSIFY is the same as IPMARK<->MARK. By using

Hello list, I'm experimenting with a little GlusterFS cluster on debian wheezy: === snip === muzzy:~# cat /etc/debian_version wheezy/sid muzzy:~# dpkg -l | grep gluster ii glusterfs-client 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (client package) ii glusterfs-common 3.2.6-1 GlusterFS common libraries and translator modules ii glusterfs-server 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (server package) === snip

I'm starting a new thread on this, because I have more concrete information than I did the first time around. The full rebalance log from the machine where I started the rebalance can be found at the following link. It is slightly redacted - one search/replace was made to replace an identifying word with REDACTED. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97770508/mdfs-rebalance-redacted.zip

...  260576    6.2     262144       6.3     1    2   815618   829664    1       17   288 253   754981    0 Net0 RX: 849569343bytes  4083414pkts        0err       42drop  TX: 835193519bytes  1976265pkts        0err        0drop Net1 RX:     7279bytes       40pkts        0err  2362084drop  TX:        0bytes        0pkts        0err        0drop _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...ing remote file (0.265384 kb/s) (average 0.265384 kb/s) smb: \hubi\> So, what's happening here ? IMHO, smbd makes a open(file_A), read(file_A) gets 16k and send them to the client, then it is waiting for the next bytes and ... ... I would suggest is: sending 0bytes to the client for what reason ever. But you will know better, and having a solution (I hope) Thanx in advance Hubertus Krogmann PaderLinx Neue Informationsmedien GmbH Email: hubertus.krogmann@paderlinx.de Tel.: 05251-8994-18 Fax: 05251-8994-20 WWW: www.paderlinx.de