search for: 0b95a0c3

...yone who works on LLVM, but it would make it easier for Apple to dogfood their own IDE. I also hear the generated project files are not so good, though. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130522/0b95a0c3/attachment.html>

On May 22, 2013, at 5:14 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > Hi All, > > Can anyone see good a reason not to move to cmake as our only build > configuration system and drop future support for autoconf + makefiles > now that 3.3 has branched? I can think of several: - When the Clang CMakefiles go to build compiler-rt (if present), they use the compiler used to build Clang and not the

Hi All, I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one more than we (or I) want to support. I don't know of any support in autoconf past the --host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cmake. I'll send out an assertion here that this support isn't necessary and any system