search for: 0ad402a7

...;> After the patch it ended with the following (note that the IP is the same >> as the Station IP address): >> NBP file download successfully. >> LibLocateHandle returned nr 8 >> Handle [0] gave -3 00000000 >> Handle [1] gave -3 00000000 >> Handle [2] gave 0 0ad402a7 >> Getting cached packet >> My IP is 10.212.2.167 I'd guess that the ARP packets are being seen on NIC0 and not NIC1. I'm hoping to have another patch this week. >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Gene Cumm via Syslinux >> <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >...

...t; My IP is 0.0.0.0 > > After the patch it ended with the following (note that the IP is the same > as the Station IP address): > NBP file download successfully. > LibLocateHandle returned nr 8 > Handle [0] gave -3 00000000 > Handle [1] gave -3 00000000 > Handle [2] gave 0 0ad402a7 > Getting cached packet > My IP is 10.212.2.167 > > Greetings, > > > Sebastian > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Gene Cumm via Syslinux < > syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wr...

...t; My IP is 0.0.0.0 > > After the patch it ended with the following (note that the IP is the same as > the Station IP address): > NBP file download successfully. > LibLocateHandle returned nr 8 > Handle [0] gave -3 00000000 > Handle [1] gave -3 00000000 > Handle [2] gave 0 0ad402a7 > Getting cached packet > My IP is 10.212.2.167 > > Greetings, > > > Sebastian > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Gene Cumm via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>...

...nload successfully. Getting cached packet My IP is 0.0.0.0 After the patch it ended with the following (note that the IP is the same as the Station IP address): NBP file download successfully. LibLocateHandle returned nr 8 Handle [0] gave -3 00000000 Handle [1] gave -3 00000000 Handle [2] gave 0 0ad402a7 Getting cached packet My IP is 10.212.2.167 Greetings, Sebastian On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Gene Cumm via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > Starting a new thread for the moment and...

Starting a new thread for the moment and BCCing the two reporters of the issue. Looking over the code, I think I finally see why we get junk data from the PXE base. If we tell the PXE base that a buffer is 0 bytes long, we should expect junk/null data. I'm hoping to have a patch for testing over the weekend. If either of you would rather start a bug on the bugzilla, feel free. -- -Gene