search for: 0a523700afbb

It seems there still isn't a tool (at least not a Xiph one) for modifying Opus comments from the command line. I've had a go at adding support in liboggz (which is fairly trivial, since it just means adding recognition for the Opus stream). That certainly works for comment editing, but I'm not sure if it's is good enough to commit back, because timing gets reported back slightly

It seems there still isn't a tool (at least not a Xiph one) for modifying Opus comments from the command line. I've had a go at adding support in liboggz (which is fairly trivial, since it just means adding recognition for the Opus stream). That certainly works for comment editing, but I'm not sure if it's is good enough to commit back, because timing gets reported back slightly

...z, since the current default > linear one doesn't deal with first granule position being set. Thought > I'd check before getting into that whether anyone has looked at this > already? I thought Mark Harris implemented this in <https://git.xiph.org/?p=liboggz.git;a=commitdiff;h=0a523700afbb>. I'm not sure there's been a release since then, though. Are you looking at the latest git, or is there something wrong with that implementation? > Another thought, could vorbiscomment do with having Opus comment support added? Or make an opuscomment for opus-tools. I'm not s...

...gt;> linear one doesn't deal with first granule position being set. Thought >> I'd check before getting into that whether anyone has looked at this >> already? > > > I thought Mark Harris implemented this in > <https://git.xiph.org/?p=liboggz.git;a=commitdiff;h=0a523700afbb>. I'm not > sure there's been a release since then, though. Are you looking at the > latest git, or is there something wrong with that implementation? > Thanks, that does look like the right set of changes, with metrics handled too. The distro packaged version I've got didn...