search for: 09e7857c

On Jun 12, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > That sounds plausible to me. It seems like we might need a way of representing call graph profiling in addition to the existing branch probabilities? > > Agreed. An important consideration here is WPO

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > That sounds plausible to me. It seems like we might need a way of > representing call graph profiling in addition to the existing branch > probabilities? > Agreed. An important consideration here is WPO vs. LTO vs. TU-at-a-time call graphs. > FWIW, the greedy register allocator’s live range

...mputations from the spill placement code. Cool, if Diego doesn't beat me to it, I may send you a patch as that seems easy and obviously beneficial. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130612/09e7857c/attachment.html>