Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "09dd05bd".
2012 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
...aving yaks. I'm
interested in getting a really good API here, because this is the support
library that is usually held to a very high bar for APIs...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120218/09dd05bd/attachment.html>
2012 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
On Feb 18, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Talin wrote:
> + /// Add an ArrayRef of arbitrary data.
> + template<typename T>
> + GeneralHash& add(ArrayRef<T> ArrayVal) {
> + addBits(ArrayVal.begin(), ArrayVal.end());
> + return *this;
> + }
>
> Doesn't this have the same host-specificity problem, except that it will cause things that *are* stable to vary,
2012 Feb 18
3
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 12:26 AM, Talin wrote:
> > OK here's a patch with the latest, including unit tests. I've also tried
> to make the comments clear that this is intended for the case of "generic"
> key types, where you are either hashing multiple data types together, or
> you