search for: 099fcba

...void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) } #define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted -static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) +static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu) { return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu); } diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c index 099fcba..85ed343 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static void kvm_wait(u8 *ptr, u8 val) local_irq_restore(flags); } -__visible bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) +__visible bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu) { struct kvm_steal_time *src = &am...

...er blocking */ #define SPIN_THRESHOLD (1 << 15) -extern struct static_key paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled; -static __always_inline bool static_key_false(struct static_key *key); - #include <asm/qspinlock.h> /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c index 36bc664..099fcba 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c @@ -620,18 +620,4 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void) } } -static __init int kvm_spinlock_init_jump(void) -{ - if (!kvm_para_available()) - return 0; - if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT)) - return 0; - - static_k...

...er blocking */ #define SPIN_THRESHOLD (1 << 15) -extern struct static_key paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled; -static __always_inline bool static_key_false(struct static_key *key); - #include <asm/qspinlock.h> /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c index 36bc664..099fcba 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c @@ -620,18 +620,4 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void) } } -static __init int kvm_spinlock_init_jump(void) -{ - if (!kvm_para_available()) - return 0; - if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT)) - return 0; - - static_k...

...pv_lock_ops { void (*wait)(u8 *ptr, u8 val); void (*kick)(int cpu); - struct paravirt_callee_save vcpu_is_preempted; + bool (*vcpu_is_preempted)(int cpu); }; /* This contains all the paravirt structures: we get a convenient diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c index 099fcba..eb3753d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c @@ -595,7 +595,6 @@ __visible bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) return !!src->preempted; } -PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__kvm_vcpu_is_preempted); /* * Setup pv_lock_ops to exploit KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT if present...

...pv_lock_ops { void (*wait)(u8 *ptr, u8 val); void (*kick)(int cpu); - struct paravirt_callee_save vcpu_is_preempted; + bool (*vcpu_is_preempted)(int cpu); }; /* This contains all the paravirt structures: we get a convenient diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c index 099fcba..eb3753d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c @@ -595,7 +595,6 @@ __visible bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) return !!src->preempted; } -PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__kvm_vcpu_is_preempted); /* * Setup pv_lock_ops to exploit KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT if present...

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:34:01PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > It is the address of &steal_time that will exceed the 32-bit limit. That seems extremely unlikely. That would mean we have more than 4G worth of per-cpu variables declared in the kernel.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:34:01PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > It is the address of &steal_time that will exceed the 32-bit limit. That seems extremely unlikely. That would mean we have more than 4G worth of per-cpu variables declared in the kernel.

...pv_lock_ops { void (*wait)(u8 *ptr, u8 val); void (*kick)(int cpu); - struct paravirt_callee_save vcpu_is_preempted; + bool (*vcpu_is_preempted)(int cpu); }; /* This contains all the paravirt structures: we get a convenient diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c index 099fcba..eb3753d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c @@ -595,7 +595,6 @@ __visible bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) return !!src->preempted; } -PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__kvm_vcpu_is_preempted); /* * Setup pv_lock_ops to exploit KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT if present...

...pv_lock_ops { void (*wait)(u8 *ptr, u8 val); void (*kick)(int cpu); - struct paravirt_callee_save vcpu_is_preempted; + bool (*vcpu_is_preempted)(int cpu); }; /* This contains all the paravirt structures: we get a convenient diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c index 099fcba..eb3753d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c @@ -595,7 +595,6 @@ __visible bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) return !!src->preempted; } -PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__kvm_vcpu_is_preempted); /* * Setup pv_lock_ops to exploit KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT if present...

v3->v4: - Fix x86-32 build error. v2->v3: - Provide an optimized __raw_callee_save___kvm_vcpu_is_preempted() in assembly as suggested by PeterZ. - Add a new patch to change vcpu_is_preempted() argument type to long to ease the writing of the assembly code. v1->v2: - Rerun the fio test on a different system on both bare-metal and a KVM guest. Both sockets were

v3->v4: - Fix x86-32 build error. v2->v3: - Provide an optimized __raw_callee_save___kvm_vcpu_is_preempted() in assembly as suggested by PeterZ. - Add a new patch to change vcpu_is_preempted() argument type to long to ease the writing of the assembly code. v1->v2: - Rerun the fio test on a different system on both bare-metal and a KVM guest. Both sockets were

v2->v3: - Provide an optimized __raw_callee_save___kvm_vcpu_is_preempted() in assembly as suggested by PeterZ. - Add a new patch to change vcpu_is_preempted() argument type to long to ease the writing of the assembly code. v1->v2: - Rerun the fio test on a different system on both bare-metal and a KVM guest. Both sockets were utilized in this test. - The commit log was

v2->v3: - Provide an optimized __raw_callee_save___kvm_vcpu_is_preempted() in assembly as suggested by PeterZ. - Add a new patch to change vcpu_is_preempted() argument type to long to ease the writing of the assembly code. v1->v2: - Rerun the fio test on a different system on both bare-metal and a KVM guest. Both sockets were utilized in this test. - The commit log was