Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "099a9d36".
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
On 1/14/2013 3:09 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> [...] This level should always produce
> binaries at least as fast as quickopt, but they might be both slower to
> compile.
The "always" part cannot really be guaranteed or enforced. I'd state it
in terms of intention, i.e. "this level is intended to produce binaries
at least as fast as quickopt". Otherwise,
2013 Jan 14
17
[LLVMdev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
This has been an idea floating around in my head for a while and after
several discussions with others it continues to hold up so I thought I
would mail it out. Sorry for cross posting to both lists, but this is an
issue that would significantly impact both LLVM and Clang.
Essentially, LLVM provides canned optimization "levels" for frontends to
re-use. This is nothing new. However, we